From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Kirsher Subject: Re: Support e1000 M88 PHY registers in -d Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 11:00:49 -0700 Message-ID: <1304532049.2998.4.camel@jtkirshe-MOBL1> References: <20100319043229.24908.99968.reportbug@Feynman.home> <1301761441.10056.197.camel@localhost> <1301910102.2935.52.camel@localhost> <1304530875.2926.29.camel@bwh-desktop> Reply-To: jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-nfIwJLGfF5KS+Aj5CdIK" Cc: Anthony DeRobertis , netdev , "e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" , "574574@bugs.debian.org" <574574@bugs.debian.org> To: Ben Hutchings Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:26091 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755112Ab1EDSAu (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 May 2011 14:00:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1304530875.2926.29.camel@bwh-desktop> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --=-nfIwJLGfF5KS+Aj5CdIK Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 10:41 -0700, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 10:41 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 01:36 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 09:24, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > Anthony, > > > > > > > > I'm now upstream maintainer for ethtool so I've picked up your patc= h > > > > again. > > > > > > > > On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 00:32 -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > > > >> Package: ethtool > > > >> Version: 1:2.6.33-1 > > > >> Severity: wishlist > > > >> > > > >> The M88 PHY registers contain useful information like the cable le= ngth > > > >> estimate and the MDI/MDIX status. The attached patch makes -d dump > > > >> them. > > > > > > > > Patches for ethtool should include a commit message and Signed-off-= by > > > > line, as in the Linux kernel. See sections 2 and 12 of > > > > . They > > > > should be sent to this address and to netdev. > > > > > > > > I'm forwarding this patch to netdev and the e1000 developers for re= view. > > > > > > > > Ben. > > >=20 > > > Thanks Ben. Just to be clear, have you applied these e1000 changes t= o > > > the ethtool? > > [...] > >=20 > > I have not applied these changes either anywhere. >=20 > ...but I will if I don't hear back from you soon. >=20 > Ben. >=20 Go ahead and apply the changes. I apologize, I thought I had already pushed this patch. --=-nfIwJLGfF5KS+Aj5CdIK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAABAgAGBQJNwZRRAAoJECTsCADr/EWUCqAH/1K8oqKs009iFslJ2T5FSqnB fneP0GKKzfZ1GjTGM5SWnOkgogMV5keWCaPjcbxTBZian6KCEPqxCpEX8+4SJS3C 7Mp2S9LyfIg5WzjcjDaGChomvX9FR94qCiXHtFJBnn3U7s2xRFqF3FAMbz/AfB7f BM15vxNFPH36IkFI76yNYu89CSU2MtXvuDn08smgf06kXFv7N+YVOVdwQxkqD3jx j3CuRJRto5IBq+It/QNQJWtOgMTUz6/zTYVDdEFTObuvzAGPrFc5plyHIYiunp6P aiIJCPwXX+mcaCyqxIx/kghm2v0cocHvJ9Jan558EL5mXnvgO5V2OOAqV1Td3SM= =jZ3a -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-nfIwJLGfF5KS+Aj5CdIK--