netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@vsecurity.com>
To: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, dccp@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	security@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dccp: handle invalid feature options length
Date: Fri, 06 May 2011 10:43:52 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1304693032.1849.2.camel@dan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110506135345.GA3434@gerrit.erg.abdn.ac.uk>


> Can you please check again: did you experience this condition, to me it 
> seems the patch is based on reading this code.
> 

I saw this while reading the code.

> In this case, please consider the condition before the switch statement:
> 
>                 /* Check if this isn't a single byte option */
>                 if (opt > DCCPO_MAX_RESERVED) {
>                         if (opt_ptr == opt_end)
>                                 goto out_nonsensical_length;
> 
>                         len = *opt_ptr++;
>                         if (len < 2)
>                                 goto out_nonsensical_length;
>                          
> The described range (DCCPO_CHANGE_L = 32 ... DCCPO_CONFIRM_R = 35) is after DCCPO_MAX_RESERVED = 31,
> so that the above test applies.
> 
> Hence for these option types the len is always at least 1, so that (len - 1) >= 0.
> 

You just missed the important part:

                        if (len < 2)
                                goto out_nonsensical_length;
                        /*
                         * Remove the type and len fields, leaving
                         * just the value size
                         */
                        len     -= 2;

If the len is 2, this check will pass, and the resulting len will be 0,
causing the underflow.

Regards,
Dan

> | --- a/net/dccp/options.c
> | +++ b/net/dccp/options.c
> | @@ -123,6 +123,8 @@ int dccp_parse_options(struct sock *sk, struct dccp_request_sock *dreq,
> |  		case DCCPO_CHANGE_L ... DCCPO_CONFIRM_R:
> |  			if (pkt_type == DCCP_PKT_DATA)      /* RFC 4340, 6 */
> |  				break;
> | +			if (len == 0)
> | +				goto out_invalid_option;
> |  			rc = dccp_feat_parse_options(sk, dreq, mandatory, opt,
> |  						    *value, value + 1, len - 1);
> |  			if (rc)
> | 
> | 
> 
> -- 

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-06 14:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-06 13:27 [PATCH] dccp: handle invalid feature options length Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-06 13:53 ` Gerrit Renker
2011-05-06 14:43   ` Dan Rosenberg [this message]
2011-05-06 19:57 ` Gerrit Renker
2011-05-06 20:04   ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1304693032.1849.2.camel@dan \
    --to=drosenberg@vsecurity.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dccp@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=security@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).