From: Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@vsecurity.com>
To: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, dccp@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
security@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dccp: handle invalid feature options length
Date: Fri, 06 May 2011 10:43:52 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1304693032.1849.2.camel@dan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110506135345.GA3434@gerrit.erg.abdn.ac.uk>
> Can you please check again: did you experience this condition, to me it
> seems the patch is based on reading this code.
>
I saw this while reading the code.
> In this case, please consider the condition before the switch statement:
>
> /* Check if this isn't a single byte option */
> if (opt > DCCPO_MAX_RESERVED) {
> if (opt_ptr == opt_end)
> goto out_nonsensical_length;
>
> len = *opt_ptr++;
> if (len < 2)
> goto out_nonsensical_length;
>
> The described range (DCCPO_CHANGE_L = 32 ... DCCPO_CONFIRM_R = 35) is after DCCPO_MAX_RESERVED = 31,
> so that the above test applies.
>
> Hence for these option types the len is always at least 1, so that (len - 1) >= 0.
>
You just missed the important part:
if (len < 2)
goto out_nonsensical_length;
/*
* Remove the type and len fields, leaving
* just the value size
*/
len -= 2;
If the len is 2, this check will pass, and the resulting len will be 0,
causing the underflow.
Regards,
Dan
> | --- a/net/dccp/options.c
> | +++ b/net/dccp/options.c
> | @@ -123,6 +123,8 @@ int dccp_parse_options(struct sock *sk, struct dccp_request_sock *dreq,
> | case DCCPO_CHANGE_L ... DCCPO_CONFIRM_R:
> | if (pkt_type == DCCP_PKT_DATA) /* RFC 4340, 6 */
> | break;
> | + if (len == 0)
> | + goto out_invalid_option;
> | rc = dccp_feat_parse_options(sk, dreq, mandatory, opt,
> | *value, value + 1, len - 1);
> | if (rc)
> |
> |
>
> --
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-06 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-06 13:27 [PATCH] dccp: handle invalid feature options length Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-06 13:53 ` Gerrit Renker
2011-05-06 14:43 ` Dan Rosenberg [this message]
2011-05-06 19:57 ` Gerrit Renker
2011-05-06 20:04 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1304693032.1849.2.camel@dan \
--to=drosenberg@vsecurity.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dccp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=security@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).