* [PATCH] bonding,llc: Fix structure sizeof incompatibility for some PDUs
@ 2011-05-12 12:57 Vitalii Demianets
2011-05-12 14:33 ` Ben Hutchings
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Vitalii Demianets @ 2011-05-12 12:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jay Vosburgh, Andy Gospodarek, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Cc: netdev, bonding-devel
With some combinations of arch/compiler the sizeof operator on structure
returns value greater than expected. In cases when the structure is used for
mapping PDU fields it may lead to unexpected results (e.g. holes and
alignment problems in skb data). Attribute "packed" prevents this undesired
behavior.
Signed-off-by: Vitalii Demianets <vitas@nppfactor.kiev.ua>
---
drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.h | 10 +++++-----
include/net/llc_pdu.h | 8 ++++----
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.h b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.h
index 291dbd4..6d6327a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.h
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.h
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
typedef struct mac_addr {
u8 mac_addr_value[ETH_ALEN];
-} mac_addr_t;
+} __attribute__((packed)) mac_addr_t;
enum {
BOND_AD_STABLE = 0,
@@ -134,12 +134,12 @@ typedef struct lacpdu {
u8 tlv_type_terminator; // = terminator
u8 terminator_length; // = 0
u8 reserved_50[50]; // = 0
-} lacpdu_t;
+} __attribute__((packed)) lacpdu_t;
typedef struct lacpdu_header {
struct ethhdr hdr;
struct lacpdu lacpdu;
-} lacpdu_header_t;
+} __attribute__((packed)) lacpdu_header_t;
// Marker Protocol Data Unit(PDU) structure(43.5.3.2 in the 802.3ad standard)
typedef struct bond_marker {
@@ -155,12 +155,12 @@ typedef struct bond_marker {
u8 tlv_type_terminator; // = 0x00
u8 terminator_length; // = 0x00
u8 reserved_90[90]; // = 0
-} bond_marker_t;
+} __attribute__((packed)) bond_marker_t;
typedef struct bond_marker_header {
struct ethhdr hdr;
struct bond_marker marker;
-} bond_marker_header_t;
+} __attribute__((packed)) bond_marker_header_t;
#pragma pack()
diff --git a/include/net/llc_pdu.h b/include/net/llc_pdu.h
index 75b8e29..a8eeb3f 100644
--- a/include/net/llc_pdu.h
+++ b/include/net/llc_pdu.h
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ struct llc_pdu_sn {
u8 ssap;
u8 ctrl_1;
u8 ctrl_2;
-};
+} __attribute__((packed));
static inline struct llc_pdu_sn *llc_pdu_sn_hdr(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
@@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ struct llc_pdu_un {
u8 dsap;
u8 ssap;
u8 ctrl_1;
-};
+} __attribute__((packed));
static inline struct llc_pdu_un *llc_pdu_un_hdr(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
@@ -359,7 +359,7 @@ struct llc_xid_info {
u8 fmt_id; /* always 0x81 for LLC */
u8 type; /* different if NULL/non-NULL LSAP */
u8 rw; /* sender receive window */
-};
+} __attribute__((packed));
/**
* llc_pdu_init_as_xid_cmd - sets bytes 3, 4 & 5 of LLC header as XID
@@ -415,7 +415,7 @@ struct llc_frmr_info {
u8 curr_ssv; /* current send state variable val */
u8 curr_rsv; /* current receive state variable */
u8 ind_bits; /* indicator bits set with macro */
-};
+} __attribute__((packed));
extern void llc_pdu_set_cmd_rsp(struct sk_buff *skb, u8 type);
extern void llc_pdu_set_pf_bit(struct sk_buff *skb, u8 bit_value);
--
1.7.3.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] bonding,llc: Fix structure sizeof incompatibility for some PDUs
2011-05-12 12:57 [PATCH] bonding,llc: Fix structure sizeof incompatibility for some PDUs Vitalii Demianets
@ 2011-05-12 14:33 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-05-12 15:45 ` Vitalii Demianets
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ben Hutchings @ 2011-05-12 14:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vitalii Demianets
Cc: Jay Vosburgh, Andy Gospodarek, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, netdev,
bonding-devel
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 15:57 +0300, Vitalii Demianets wrote:
> With some combinations of arch/compiler the sizeof operator on structure
> returns value greater than expected.
Yes, some architecture ABIs set a minimum alignment for structures so
they can have greater alignment than any of their members.
> In cases when the structure is used for
> mapping PDU fields it may lead to unexpected results (e.g. holes and
> alignment problems in skb data). Attribute "packed" prevents this undesired
> behavior.
[...]
The '__packed' macro is preferred.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] bonding,llc: Fix structure sizeof incompatibility for some PDUs
2011-05-12 14:33 ` Ben Hutchings
@ 2011-05-12 15:45 ` Vitalii Demianets
2011-05-12 15:52 ` Joe Perches
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Vitalii Demianets @ 2011-05-12 15:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ben Hutchings
Cc: Jay Vosburgh, Andy Gospodarek, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, netdev,
bonding-devel
On Thursday 12 May 2011 17:33:36 Ben Hutchings wrote:
[...]
> The '__packed' macro is preferred.
Ok, it looks more compatible, i"ll resubmit the patch with this macro.
Also, I'm slightly in doubt if I should split the patch in 2 parts, one for
bonding an one for LLC?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] bonding,llc: Fix structure sizeof incompatibility for some PDUs
2011-05-12 15:45 ` Vitalii Demianets
@ 2011-05-12 15:52 ` Joe Perches
2011-05-12 16:02 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-12 16:10 ` Vitalii Demianets
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Joe Perches @ 2011-05-12 15:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vitalii Demianets
Cc: Ben Hutchings, Jay Vosburgh, Andy Gospodarek,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, netdev, bonding-devel
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 18:45 +0300, Vitalii Demianets wrote:
> On Thursday 12 May 2011 17:33:36 Ben Hutchings wrote:
> [...]
> > The '__packed' macro is preferred.
> Also, I'm slightly in doubt if I should split the patch in 2 parts, one for
> bonding an one for LLC?
What arch needs __packed for
struct mac_addr {
unsigned char addr[6];
};
?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] bonding,llc: Fix structure sizeof incompatibility for some PDUs
2011-05-12 15:52 ` Joe Perches
@ 2011-05-12 16:02 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-12 16:10 ` Vitalii Demianets
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Eric Dumazet @ 2011-05-12 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joe Perches
Cc: Vitalii Demianets, Ben Hutchings, Jay Vosburgh, Andy Gospodarek,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, netdev, bonding-devel
Le jeudi 12 mai 2011 à 08:52 -0700, Joe Perches a écrit :
> On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 18:45 +0300, Vitalii Demianets wrote:
> > On Thursday 12 May 2011 17:33:36 Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > [...]
> > > The '__packed' macro is preferred.
> > Also, I'm slightly in doubt if I should split the patch in 2 parts, one for
> > bonding an one for LLC?
>
> What arch needs __packed for
>
> struct mac_addr {
> unsigned char addr[6];
> };
>
> ?
Believe it or not, they do exist. (ARM ...)
See "struct ethhdr" definition
Check commit 7cd636fe9ce5de0051c112 for another argument.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] bonding,llc: Fix structure sizeof incompatibility for some PDUs
2011-05-12 15:52 ` Joe Perches
2011-05-12 16:02 ` Eric Dumazet
@ 2011-05-12 16:10 ` Vitalii Demianets
2011-05-12 16:16 ` Joe Perches
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Vitalii Demianets @ 2011-05-12 16:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joe Perches
Cc: Ben Hutchings, Jay Vosburgh, Andy Gospodarek,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, netdev, bonding-devel
On Thursday 12 May 2011 18:52:34 you wrote:
[...]
> What arch needs __packed for
>
> struct mac_addr {
> unsigned char addr[6];
> };
>
> ?
Currently I'm working with AT91SAM9260 which is an ARM CPU, and without
__packed I get sizeof(struct mac_addr) == 8.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] bonding,llc: Fix structure sizeof incompatibility for some PDUs
2011-05-12 16:10 ` Vitalii Demianets
@ 2011-05-12 16:16 ` Joe Perches
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Joe Perches @ 2011-05-12 16:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vitalii Demianets
Cc: Jay Vosburgh, Ben Hutchings, Andy Gospodarek,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, netdev, bonding-devel
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 19:10 +0300, Vitalii Demianets wrote:
> On Thursday 12 May 2011 18:52:34 you wrote:
> [...]
> > What arch needs __packed for
> > struct mac_addr {
> > unsigned char addr[6];
> > };
> > ?
> Currently I'm working with AT91SAM9260 which is an ARM CPU, and without
> __packed I get sizeof(struct mac_addr) == 8.
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-05-12 16:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-05-12 12:57 [PATCH] bonding,llc: Fix structure sizeof incompatibility for some PDUs Vitalii Demianets
2011-05-12 14:33 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-05-12 15:45 ` Vitalii Demianets
2011-05-12 15:52 ` Joe Perches
2011-05-12 16:02 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-12 16:10 ` Vitalii Demianets
2011-05-12 16:16 ` Joe Perches
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).