Re: [PATCH v3 resend] netfilter: nf_conntrack_sip: Handle Cisco 7941/7945 IP phones

[Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>]

Le jeudi 26 mai 2011 à 18:50 +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso a écrit :
> Hi Eric,
> 
> On 20/05/11 06:36, Kevin Cernekee wrote:
> > Most SIP devices use a source port of 5060/udp on SIP requests, so the
> > response automatically comes back to port 5060:
> > 
> > phone_ip:5060 -> proxy_ip:5060   REGISTER
> > proxy_ip:5060 -> phone_ip:5060   100 Trying
> > 
> > The newer Cisco IP phones, however, use a randomly chosen high source
> > port for the SIP request but expect the response on port 5060:
> > 
> > phone_ip:49173 -> proxy_ip:5060  REGISTER
> > proxy_ip:5060 -> phone_ip:5060   100 Trying
> > 
> > Standard Linux NAT, with or without nf_nat_sip, will send the reply back
> > to port 49173, not 5060:
> > 
> > phone_ip:49173 -> proxy_ip:5060  REGISTER
> > proxy_ip:5060 -> phone_ip:49173  100 Trying
> > 
> > But the phone is not listening on 49173, so it will never see the reply.
> > 
> > This patch modifies nf_*_sip to work around this quirk by extracting
> > the SIP response port from the Via: header, iff the source IP in the
> > packet header matches the source IP in the SIP request.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@gmail.com>
> > Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
> 
> @Eric: could you please confirm that you ack'ed this patch? I don't find
> the email with your explicit ack.

Yes I did it ;)

http://www.spinics.net/lists/netfilter/msg49632.html

Thanks !


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html