netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
To: "Michał Mirosław" <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ethtool: ETHTOOL_SFEATURES: remove NETIF_F_COMPAT return
Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 15:13:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1306505626.2759.4.camel@bwh-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110524215923.GA20138@rere.qmqm.pl>

On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 23:59 +0200, Michał Mirosław wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 03:39:30PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
> > Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 11:14:37 +0200
> > 
> > > On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 12:03:31PM +0200, Michał Mirosław wrote:
> > >> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 02:09:58PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> > >> > You guys really need to sort this out properly.
> > >> > Please resubmit whatever final solution is agreed upon.
> > >> I noticed that v2.6.39 was tagged today. We should definitely remove
> > >> NETIF_F_COMPAT so it won't bite us in the future. The other patch that
> > >> fixes ethtool_ops->set_flags compatibility is a bugfix, so it should go
> > >> in - if we decide that the SFEATURES compatibility should be removed
> > >> it won't matter.
> > >> 
> > >> Ben, do you agree?
> > > Ping?
> > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/95552/
> > > (this is a bugfix, so should go to stable)
> > > 
> > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/95753/
> > > (removes ETHTOOL_F_COMPAT; this we need to decide on)
> > You and Ben are still arguing over details.
> > 
> > I want fresh versions of these patches (yes, both of them) once
> > all of the issues are resolved.
> 
> We could just wait for 2.6.40 and pretend this code part never existed. ;-)

I think I will make ethtool check for a minimum kernel version of 2.6.40
before using ETHTOOL_{G,S}FEATURES.

> I'll rebase the first patch tomorrow. Without it the compatibility in
> ETHTOOL_SFEATURES for non-converted drivers is busted wrt set_flags.

This is an improvement, but I still think the fallback is fundamentally
broken - there's no good way for userland to tell what (if anything)
went wrong when the return value has ETHTOOL_F_COMPAT set.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.


  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-27 14:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-14  1:05 [PATCH net-2.6] ethtool: Remove fallback to old ethtool operations for ETHTOOL_SFEATURES Ben Hutchings
2011-05-14  9:54 ` Michał Mirosław
2011-05-14 20:08   ` Ben Hutchings
2011-05-14 10:31 ` [PATCH] net: fix ETHTOOL_SFEATURES compatibility with old ethtool_ops.set_flags Michał Mirosław
2011-05-14 10:35 ` [PATCH net-2.6] ethtool: Remove fallback to old ethtool operations for ETHTOOL_SFEATURES Michał Mirosław
2011-05-16  2:45   ` Ben Hutchings
2011-05-16 12:13     ` Michał Mirosław
2011-05-16 13:28     ` [PATCH] ethtool: ETHTOOL_SFEATURES: remove NETIF_F_COMPAT return Michał Mirosław
2011-05-16 13:37       ` Ben Hutchings
2011-05-16 14:23         ` Michał Mirosław
2011-05-16 14:53           ` Ben Hutchings
2011-05-16 15:01             ` Michał Mirosław
2011-05-16 15:57               ` [RFC PATCH ethtool 1/3] ethtool: Regularise offload feature settings Ben Hutchings
2011-05-16 15:57               ` [RFC PATCH ethtool 2/3] ethtool: Report any consequential offload feature changes Ben Hutchings
2011-05-16 15:58               ` [RFC PATCH ethtool 3/3] ethtool: Use ETHTOOL_{G,S}FEATURES where available Ben Hutchings
2011-05-16 20:51             ` [PATCH] ethtool: ETHTOOL_SFEATURES: remove NETIF_F_COMPAT return Michał Mirosław
2011-05-16 21:08               ` Ben Hutchings
2011-05-16 21:50                 ` Michał Mirosław
2011-05-16 22:09                   ` Ben Hutchings
2011-05-17  8:45                     ` Michał Mirosław
2011-05-17 20:33                     ` [RFC PATCH ethtool] ethtool: merge ETHTOOL_[GS]FEATURES support to -k/-K modes Michał Mirosław
2011-05-18 19:02                     ` [PATCH] ethtool: ETHTOOL_SFEATURES: remove NETIF_F_COMPAT return Ben Hutchings
2011-05-19  9:18                       ` Michał Mirosław
2011-05-19 13:25                         ` [RFC PATCH v3 ethtool] ethtool: implement [GS]FEATURES calls Michał Mirosław
2011-05-16 20:54             ` [RFC PATCH ethtool] ethtool: implement G/SFEATURES calls Michał Mirosław
2011-05-16 18:09           ` [PATCH] ethtool: ETHTOOL_SFEATURES: remove NETIF_F_COMPAT return David Miller
2011-05-19 10:03             ` Michał Mirosław
2011-05-24  9:14               ` Michał Mirosław
2011-05-24 19:39                 ` David Miller
2011-05-24 21:59                   ` Michał Mirosław
2011-05-27 14:13                     ` Ben Hutchings [this message]
2011-05-27 15:28                       ` Michał Mirosław
2011-05-27 15:45                         ` Ben Hutchings
2011-05-27 16:34                           ` Michał Mirosław
2011-05-27 23:25                             ` Ben Hutchings
2011-05-28  7:35                               ` Michał Mirosław
     [not found]                                 ` <20110528073525.GA19033-CoA6ZxLDdyEEUmgCuDUIdw@public.gmane.org>
2011-05-28 10:07                                   ` [Xen-devel] " Ian Campbell
     [not found]                                     ` <1306577228.23577.17.camel-ztPmHsLffjjnO4AKDKe2m+kiAK3p4hvP@public.gmane.org>
2011-05-28 17:31                                       ` Jesse Gross
     [not found]                                         ` <BANLkTime8PHYe+BFELt92gg7SZ91xKvAwA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2011-05-29  9:38                                           ` Michał Mirosław
     [not found]                                             ` <20110529093849.GA5245-CoA6ZxLDdyEEUmgCuDUIdw@public.gmane.org>
2011-05-31 18:43                                               ` Jesse Gross
2011-05-26 10:42                   ` [RESEND PATCH net] net: fix ETHTOOL_SFEATURES compatibility with old ethtool_ops.set_flags Michał Mirosław
2011-05-26 18:14                     ` David Miller
2011-05-14 10:41 ` [PATCH v2] " Michał Mirosław

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1306505626.2759.4.camel@bwh-desktop \
    --to=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).