From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, ruediger.herbst@googlemail.com,
bhamilton04@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] sungem: Spring cleaning and GRO support
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 13:45:07 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1306899907.29297.12.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110531.194115.486383514.davem@davemloft.net>
> And I think I see what the problem is:
>
> > + if (unlikely(netif_queue_stopped(dev) &&
> > + TX_BUFFS_AVAIL(gp) > (MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1))) {
> > + netif_tx_lock(dev);
> > + if (netif_queue_stopped(dev) &&
> > + TX_BUFFS_AVAIL(gp) > (MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1))
> > + netif_wake_queue(dev);
> > + netif_tx_unlock(dev);
> > + }
> > }
>
> Don't use netif_tx_lock(), that has a loop and multiple atomics :-)
>
> It's going to grab a special global TX lock, and then grab a lock for
> TX queue zero, and finally set an atomic state bit in TX queue zero.
>
> Take a look at the implementation in netdevice.h
Ah good point ! I think I stole that from another driver (or I just had
a brain fart), indeed, it's bad.
> It's a special "lock everything TX", a mechanism for multiqueue
> drivers to shut quiesce all TX queue activity safely in one operation.
>
> Instead, do something like:
>
> struct netdev_queue *txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(dev, 0);
>
> __netif_tx_lock(txq, smp_processor_id();
> ...
> __netif_tx_unlock(txq);
>
> and I bet your TX numbers improve a bit.
Right, I'll give that a go. With the assistance of the other Ben H I've
been able to simplify the driver a lot more now too. mutex and remaining
lock are gone, rtnl lock does the job fine for synchronizing vs. reset
task and I cleared up a ton more of unused bits and pieces now that we
don't deal with link timer when the thing is off anymore.
I'll have a new patch later today hopefully with new numbers.
Cheers,
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-01 3:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-31 7:59 [RFC/PATCH] sungem: Spring cleaning and GRO support Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-05-31 20:59 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-05-31 21:58 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-05-31 22:17 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-05-31 23:55 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-06-01 0:04 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-06-01 2:41 ` David Miller
2011-06-01 3:45 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2011-06-01 6:24 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-06-01 6:35 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1306899907.29297.12.camel@pasglop \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bhamilton04@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ruediger.herbst@googlemail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).