From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
To: igor@novg.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org,
bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 36602] New: Bridge fails to work normally without net.ipv4.ip_forward=1
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 23:37:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1307140667.22348.120.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110603123632.139f83ca.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 12:36 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
[...]
> > At the bridge, on each interface i've created a vlan, and then bridged them:
> > # vconfig add eth0 102
> > # vconfig add eth1 102
> > # brctl addbr br0
> > # brctl addif br0 eth0.102
> > # brctl addif br0 eth1.102
> > # ip link set br0 mtu 9000 up
> > ...etc...
> >
> > At this point, the bridge seems to be working, i can ping between host1 &
> > host2, even with jumbo frames without fragmentation.
> >
> > BUT when i am trying to use iperf & friends to measure raw tcp speed between
> > hosts 1/2, i'm getting something weird like 7-10 MEGABITS per second, or even
> > an iperf hang until ctrl+c.
This sounds like a symptom of doing LRO on a bridged device. Normally
we turn off LRO for bridge members automatically, but we haven't been
doing that when the bridge members are VLAN devices.
> > If i attach an ip address to the bridge, and measure between hosts and the
> > bridge, it works flawlessly, rendering 9.8Gbit/s in both directions.
> >
> > While trying to find a solution, when i ran out of options, i've set
> > net.ipv4.ip_forward to 1, and, SURPRISE, the bridge started to work like a
> > charm, at almost 10gig speed.
[...]
Right, that should force LRO off for all devices with IPv4 set up.
This should be fixed by:
commit f11970e383acd6f505f492f1bc07fb1a4d884829
Author: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Date: Tue May 24 08:31:09 2011 +0000
net: make dev_disable_lro use physical device if passed a vlan dev (v2)
which is in 3.0-rc1.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-03 22:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-36602-10286@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2011-06-03 19:36 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 36602] New: Bridge fails to work normally without net.ipv4.ip_forward=1 Andrew Morton
2011-06-03 22:37 ` Ben Hutchings [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1307140667.22348.120.camel@localhost \
--to=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=igor@novg.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).