From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: small RPS cache for fragments? Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 19:15:13 +0200 Message-ID: <1307380513.3098.76.camel@edumazet-laptop> References: <20110517.143342.1566027350038182221.davem@davemloft.net> <20110524.160123.2051949867829317339.davem@davemloft.net> <1306273128.8149.1444.camel@tardy> <20110604.132940.2214949964968775365.davem@davemloft.net> <1307380132.8149.2718.camel@tardy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: rick.jones2@hp.com Return-path: Received: from mail-ww0-f42.google.com ([74.125.82.42]:50933 "EHLO mail-ww0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751695Ab1FFRPR (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jun 2011 13:15:17 -0400 Received: by wwk4 with SMTP id 4so1694668wwk.1 for ; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 10:15:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1307380132.8149.2718.camel@tardy> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le lundi 06 juin 2011 =C3=A0 10:08 -0700, Rick Jones a =C3=A9crit : > Mode-rr bonding reorders TCP segments all the time.=20 Shouldnt TCP frames have DF bit set ?