From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] inetpeer: lower false sharing effect Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 06:54:12 +0200 Message-ID: <1307768052.2872.50.camel@edumazet-laptop> References: <1307600810.3980.85.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1307664235.17300.44.camel@schen9-DESK> <20110609.204330.2090335955971650557.davem@davemloft.net> <1307745190.17300.85.camel@schen9-DESK> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Tim Chen , David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org, andi@firstfloor.org To: Changli Gao Return-path: Received: from mail-ww0-f42.google.com ([74.125.82.42]:50135 "EHLO mail-ww0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751527Ab1FKEyR (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Jun 2011 00:54:17 -0400 Received: by wwk4 with SMTP id 4so1272326wwk.1 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 21:54:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le samedi 11 juin 2011 =C3=A0 08:54 +0800, Changli Gao a =C3=A9crit : > Did you disable routing cache when profiling? If so, enable it and tr= y again. >=20 Whole point of the exercice is to prepare ground for routing cache removal :) If you want a server being hit by millions of clients around the world, routing cache is a real pain because of memory needs.