* [RFC 0/2] Allow NICs to pass Frame Checksum up the stack.
@ 2011-06-17 4:30 greearb
2011-06-17 4:30 ` [RFC 1/2] net: Support getting/setting RX-FCS in drivers greearb
2011-06-17 4:30 ` [RFC 2/2] e100: Support receiving Ethernet FCS greearb
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: greearb @ 2011-06-17 4:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: Ben Greear
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
This series provides ethtool support to set and get the rx-checksum
flag, and adds support to the e100 driver.
Assuming this series is acceptable, I would then propose a series of patches
to allow receiving all frames, even ones with bad checksums, etc.
And if that is acceptable, a third series would allow user-space to generate
packets with custom ethernet frame checksums (ie, bad ones if desired).
And finally, more drivers, such as e1000 and hopefully e100e can
be supported.
Ben Greear (2):
net: Support getting/setting RX-FCS in drivers.
e100: Support receiving Ethernet FCS.
drivers/net/e100.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
include/linux/ethtool.h | 5 +++++
net/core/ethtool.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--
1.7.3.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [RFC 1/2] net: Support getting/setting RX-FCS in drivers.
2011-06-17 4:30 [RFC 0/2] Allow NICs to pass Frame Checksum up the stack greearb
@ 2011-06-17 4:30 ` greearb
2011-06-17 7:36 ` Michał Mirosław
2011-06-17 12:20 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-06-17 4:30 ` [RFC 2/2] e100: Support receiving Ethernet FCS greearb
1 sibling, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: greearb @ 2011-06-17 4:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: Ben Greear
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
This will allow us to enable/disable having the Ethernet
frame checksum appended to the skb. Enabling this is
useful when sniffing packets.
In particular, this can be used to test logic that allows
a NIC to receive all frames, even ones with bad checksums.
Signed-off-by: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
---
:100644 100644 439b173... e5e8747... M include/linux/ethtool.h
:100644 100644 fd14116... b36bac7... M net/core/ethtool.c
include/linux/ethtool.h | 5 +++++
net/core/ethtool.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/ethtool.h b/include/linux/ethtool.h
index 439b173..e5e8747 100644
--- a/include/linux/ethtool.h
+++ b/include/linux/ethtool.h
@@ -955,6 +955,8 @@ struct ethtool_ops {
int (*get_dump_data)(struct net_device *,
struct ethtool_dump *, void *);
int (*set_dump)(struct net_device *, struct ethtool_dump *);
+ int (*set_save_fcs)(struct net_device *, u32);
+ int (*get_save_fcs)(struct net_device *, u32 *);
};
#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
@@ -1029,6 +1031,9 @@ struct ethtool_ops {
#define ETHTOOL_SET_DUMP 0x0000003e /* Set dump settings */
#define ETHTOOL_GET_DUMP_FLAG 0x0000003f /* Get dump settings */
#define ETHTOOL_GET_DUMP_DATA 0x00000040 /* Get dump data */
+#define ETHTOOL_GETRXFCS 0x00000041 /* Get RX Save Frame Checksum */
+#define ETHTOOL_SETRXFCS 0x00000042 /* Set RX Save Frame Checksum */
+
/* compatibility with older code */
#define SPARC_ETH_GSET ETHTOOL_GSET
diff --git a/net/core/ethtool.c b/net/core/ethtool.c
index fd14116..b36bac7 100644
--- a/net/core/ethtool.c
+++ b/net/core/ethtool.c
@@ -1927,6 +1927,38 @@ out:
return ret;
}
+static int ethtool_get_rx_fcs(struct net_device *dev, void __user *useraddr)
+{
+ struct ethtool_value edata;
+ int rv = 0;
+
+ if (!dev->ethtool_ops->get_save_fcs)
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+ rv = dev->ethtool_ops->get_save_fcs(dev, &edata.data);
+ if (rv < 0)
+ return rv;
+
+ if (copy_to_user(useraddr, &edata, sizeof(edata)))
+ return -EFAULT;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+
+static int ethtool_set_rx_fcs(struct net_device *dev, void __user *useraddr)
+{
+ struct ethtool_value id;
+
+ if (!dev->ethtool_ops->set_save_fcs)
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+ if (copy_from_user(&id, useraddr, sizeof(id)))
+ return -EFAULT;
+
+ return dev->ethtool_ops->set_save_fcs(dev, id.data);
+}
+
+
/* The main entry point in this file. Called from net/core/dev.c */
int dev_ethtool(struct net *net, struct ifreq *ifr)
@@ -2152,6 +2184,12 @@ int dev_ethtool(struct net *net, struct ifreq *ifr)
case ETHTOOL_GET_DUMP_DATA:
rc = ethtool_get_dump_data(dev, useraddr);
break;
+ case ETHTOOL_SETRXFCS:
+ rc = ethtool_set_rx_fcs(dev, useraddr);
+ break;
+ case ETHTOOL_GETRXFCS:
+ rc = ethtool_get_rx_fcs(dev, useraddr);
+ break;
default:
rc = -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
--
1.7.3.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [RFC 2/2] e100: Support receiving Ethernet FCS.
2011-06-17 4:30 [RFC 0/2] Allow NICs to pass Frame Checksum up the stack greearb
2011-06-17 4:30 ` [RFC 1/2] net: Support getting/setting RX-FCS in drivers greearb
@ 2011-06-17 4:30 ` greearb
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: greearb @ 2011-06-17 4:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: Ben Greear
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Helps when sniffing packets.
Signed-off-by: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
---
:100644 100644 e336c79... 80fcadf... M drivers/net/e100.c
drivers/net/e100.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/e100.c b/drivers/net/e100.c
index e336c79..80fcadf 100644
--- a/drivers/net/e100.c
+++ b/drivers/net/e100.c
@@ -587,6 +587,7 @@ struct nic {
multicast_all = (1 << 2),
wol_magic = (1 << 3),
ich_10h_workaround = (1 << 4),
+ save_fcs = (1 << 5),
} flags ____cacheline_aligned;
enum mac mac;
@@ -1130,6 +1131,9 @@ static void e100_configure(struct nic *nic, struct cb *cb, struct sk_buff *skb)
config->promiscuous_mode = 0x1; /* 1=on, 0=off */
}
+ if (nic->flags & save_fcs)
+ config->rx_crc_transfer = 0x1; /* 1=save, 0=discard */
+
if (nic->flags & multicast_all)
config->multicast_all = 0x1; /* 1=accept, 0=no */
@@ -1917,6 +1921,7 @@ static int e100_rx_indicate(struct nic *nic, struct rx *rx,
struct sk_buff *skb = rx->skb;
struct rfd *rfd = (struct rfd *)skb->data;
u16 rfd_status, actual_size;
+ u16 fcs_pad = 0;
if (unlikely(work_done && *work_done >= work_to_do))
return -EAGAIN;
@@ -1949,9 +1954,11 @@ static int e100_rx_indicate(struct nic *nic, struct rx *rx,
}
/* Get actual data size */
+ if (nic->flags & save_fcs)
+ fcs_pad = 4;
actual_size = le16_to_cpu(rfd->actual_size) & 0x3FFF;
- if (unlikely(actual_size > RFD_BUF_LEN - sizeof(struct rfd)))
- actual_size = RFD_BUF_LEN - sizeof(struct rfd);
+ if (unlikely(actual_size > RFD_BUF_LEN + fcs_pad - sizeof(struct rfd)))
+ actual_size = RFD_BUF_LEN + fcs_pad - sizeof(struct rfd);
/* Get data */
pci_unmap_single(nic->pdev, rx->dma_addr,
@@ -1978,7 +1985,7 @@ static int e100_rx_indicate(struct nic *nic, struct rx *rx,
if (unlikely(!(rfd_status & cb_ok))) {
/* Don't indicate if hardware indicates errors */
dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
- } else if (actual_size > ETH_DATA_LEN + VLAN_ETH_HLEN) {
+ } else if (actual_size > ETH_DATA_LEN + VLAN_ETH_HLEN + fcs_pad) {
/* Don't indicate oversized frames */
nic->rx_over_length_errors++;
dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
@@ -2370,6 +2377,30 @@ static int e100_set_settings(struct net_device *netdev, struct ethtool_cmd *cmd)
return err;
}
+static int e100_set_save_fcs(struct net_device *netdev, u32 data)
+{
+ struct nic *nic = netdev_priv(netdev);
+ if (data)
+ nic->flags |= save_fcs;
+ else
+ nic->flags &= ~save_fcs;
+
+ e100_exec_cb(nic, NULL, e100_configure);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int e100_get_save_fcs(struct net_device *netdev, u32* data)
+{
+ struct nic *nic = netdev_priv(netdev);
+ if (nic->flags & save_fcs)
+ *data = 1;
+ else
+ *data = 0;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static void e100_get_drvinfo(struct net_device *netdev,
struct ethtool_drvinfo *info)
{
@@ -2689,6 +2720,8 @@ static const struct ethtool_ops e100_ethtool_ops = {
.set_phys_id = e100_set_phys_id,
.get_ethtool_stats = e100_get_ethtool_stats,
.get_sset_count = e100_get_sset_count,
+ .set_save_fcs = e100_set_save_fcs,
+ .get_save_fcs = e100_get_save_fcs,
};
static int e100_do_ioctl(struct net_device *netdev, struct ifreq *ifr, int cmd)
--
1.7.3.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC 1/2] net: Support getting/setting RX-FCS in drivers.
2011-06-17 4:30 ` [RFC 1/2] net: Support getting/setting RX-FCS in drivers greearb
@ 2011-06-17 7:36 ` Michał Mirosław
2011-06-17 12:20 ` Ben Hutchings
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Michał Mirosław @ 2011-06-17 7:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: greearb; +Cc: netdev
2011/6/17 <greearb@candelatech.com>:
> From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
>
> This will allow us to enable/disable having the Ethernet
> frame checksum appended to the skb. Enabling this is
> useful when sniffing packets.
>
> In particular, this can be used to test logic that allows
> a NIC to receive all frames, even ones with bad checksums.
You want to silently run away from extending dev->features field? ;-)
Best Regards,
Michał Mirosław
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC 1/2] net: Support getting/setting RX-FCS in drivers.
2011-06-17 4:30 ` [RFC 1/2] net: Support getting/setting RX-FCS in drivers greearb
2011-06-17 7:36 ` Michał Mirosław
@ 2011-06-17 12:20 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-06-17 15:33 ` Ben Greear
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ben Hutchings @ 2011-06-17 12:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: greearb; +Cc: netdev
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 21:30 -0700, greearb@candelatech.com wrote:
> From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
>
> This will allow us to enable/disable having the Ethernet
> frame checksum appended to the skb. Enabling this is
> useful when sniffing packets.
>
> In particular, this can be used to test logic that allows
> a NIC to receive all frames, even ones with bad checksums.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
> ---
> :100644 100644 439b173... e5e8747... M include/linux/ethtool.h
> :100644 100644 fd14116... b36bac7... M net/core/ethtool.c
> include/linux/ethtool.h | 5 +++++
> net/core/ethtool.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/ethtool.h b/include/linux/ethtool.h
> index 439b173..e5e8747 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ethtool.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ethtool.h
> @@ -955,6 +955,8 @@ struct ethtool_ops {
> int (*get_dump_data)(struct net_device *,
> struct ethtool_dump *, void *);
> int (*set_dump)(struct net_device *, struct ethtool_dump *);
> + int (*set_save_fcs)(struct net_device *, u32);
> + int (*get_save_fcs)(struct net_device *, u32 *);
These need to be described in the kernel-doc.
Why do these function names use 'save_fcs' whereas the command names use
'RXFCS'?
> };
> #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
> @@ -1029,6 +1031,9 @@ struct ethtool_ops {
> #define ETHTOOL_SET_DUMP 0x0000003e /* Set dump settings */
> #define ETHTOOL_GET_DUMP_FLAG 0x0000003f /* Get dump settings */
> #define ETHTOOL_GET_DUMP_DATA 0x00000040 /* Get dump data */
> +#define ETHTOOL_GETRXFCS 0x00000041 /* Get RX Save Frame Checksum */
> +#define ETHTOOL_SETRXFCS 0x00000042 /* Set RX Save Frame Checksum */
> +
>
> /* compatibility with older code */
> #define SPARC_ETH_GSET ETHTOOL_GSET
> diff --git a/net/core/ethtool.c b/net/core/ethtool.c
> index fd14116..b36bac7 100644
> --- a/net/core/ethtool.c
> +++ b/net/core/ethtool.c
> @@ -1927,6 +1927,38 @@ out:
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int ethtool_get_rx_fcs(struct net_device *dev, void __user *useraddr)
> +{
> + struct ethtool_value edata;
> + int rv = 0;
> +
> + if (!dev->ethtool_ops->get_save_fcs)
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> + rv = dev->ethtool_ops->get_save_fcs(dev, &edata.data);
> + if (rv < 0)
> + return rv;
> +
> + if (copy_to_user(useraddr, &edata, sizeof(edata)))
> + return -EFAULT;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +
> +static int ethtool_set_rx_fcs(struct net_device *dev, void __user *useraddr)
> +{
> + struct ethtool_value id;
> +
> + if (!dev->ethtool_ops->set_save_fcs)
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> + if (copy_from_user(&id, useraddr, sizeof(id)))
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> + return dev->ethtool_ops->set_save_fcs(dev, id.data);
> +}
> +
> +
> /* The main entry point in this file. Called from net/core/dev.c */
>
> int dev_ethtool(struct net *net, struct ifreq *ifr)
> @@ -2152,6 +2184,12 @@ int dev_ethtool(struct net *net, struct ifreq *ifr)
> case ETHTOOL_GET_DUMP_DATA:
> rc = ethtool_get_dump_data(dev, useraddr);
> break;
> + case ETHTOOL_SETRXFCS:
> + rc = ethtool_set_rx_fcs(dev, useraddr);
> + break;
> + case ETHTOOL_GETRXFCS:
> + rc = ethtool_get_rx_fcs(dev, useraddr);
> + break;
You can use ethtool_{get,set}_value() rather than adding new trivial
functions.
And as Michal says, this could reasonably be a feature not an entirely
separate flag. I'm not sure it's that important to have debugging flags
in features, but I also don't want to have 2 commands per flag...
Ben.
> default:
> rc = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> }
--
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC 1/2] net: Support getting/setting RX-FCS in drivers.
2011-06-17 12:20 ` Ben Hutchings
@ 2011-06-17 15:33 ` Ben Greear
2011-06-17 16:00 ` Ben Hutchings
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ben Greear @ 2011-06-17 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ben Hutchings; +Cc: netdev
On 06/17/2011 05:20 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 21:30 -0700, greearb@candelatech.com wrote:
>> From: Ben Greear<greearb@candelatech.com>
>>
>> This will allow us to enable/disable having the Ethernet
>> frame checksum appended to the skb. Enabling this is
>> useful when sniffing packets.
>>
>> In particular, this can be used to test logic that allows
>> a NIC to receive all frames, even ones with bad checksums.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ben Greear<greearb@candelatech.com>
>> ---
>> :100644 100644 439b173... e5e8747... M include/linux/ethtool.h
>> :100644 100644 fd14116... b36bac7... M net/core/ethtool.c
>> include/linux/ethtool.h | 5 +++++
>> net/core/ethtool.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/ethtool.h b/include/linux/ethtool.h
>> index 439b173..e5e8747 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/ethtool.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/ethtool.h
>> @@ -955,6 +955,8 @@ struct ethtool_ops {
>> int (*get_dump_data)(struct net_device *,
>> struct ethtool_dump *, void *);
>> int (*set_dump)(struct net_device *, struct ethtool_dump *);
>> + int (*set_save_fcs)(struct net_device *, u32);
>> + int (*get_save_fcs)(struct net_device *, u32 *);
>
> These need to be described in the kernel-doc.
>
> Why do these function names use 'save_fcs' whereas the command names use
> 'RXFCS'?
>
>> };
>> #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
>> @@ -1029,6 +1031,9 @@ struct ethtool_ops {
>> #define ETHTOOL_SET_DUMP 0x0000003e /* Set dump settings */
>> #define ETHTOOL_GET_DUMP_FLAG 0x0000003f /* Get dump settings */
>> #define ETHTOOL_GET_DUMP_DATA 0x00000040 /* Get dump data */
>> +#define ETHTOOL_GETRXFCS 0x00000041 /* Get RX Save Frame Checksum */
>> +#define ETHTOOL_SETRXFCS 0x00000042 /* Set RX Save Frame Checksum */
>> +
>>
>> /* compatibility with older code */
>> #define SPARC_ETH_GSET ETHTOOL_GSET
>> diff --git a/net/core/ethtool.c b/net/core/ethtool.c
>> index fd14116..b36bac7 100644
>> --- a/net/core/ethtool.c
>> +++ b/net/core/ethtool.c
>> @@ -1927,6 +1927,38 @@ out:
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> +static int ethtool_get_rx_fcs(struct net_device *dev, void __user *useraddr)
>> +{
>> + struct ethtool_value edata;
>> + int rv = 0;
>> +
>> + if (!dev->ethtool_ops->get_save_fcs)
>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +
>> + rv = dev->ethtool_ops->get_save_fcs(dev,&edata.data);
>> + if (rv< 0)
>> + return rv;
>> +
>> + if (copy_to_user(useraddr,&edata, sizeof(edata)))
>> + return -EFAULT;
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +
>> +static int ethtool_set_rx_fcs(struct net_device *dev, void __user *useraddr)
>> +{
>> + struct ethtool_value id;
>> +
>> + if (!dev->ethtool_ops->set_save_fcs)
>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +
>> + if (copy_from_user(&id, useraddr, sizeof(id)))
>> + return -EFAULT;
>> +
>> + return dev->ethtool_ops->set_save_fcs(dev, id.data);
>> +}
>> +
>> +
>> /* The main entry point in this file. Called from net/core/dev.c */
>>
>> int dev_ethtool(struct net *net, struct ifreq *ifr)
>> @@ -2152,6 +2184,12 @@ int dev_ethtool(struct net *net, struct ifreq *ifr)
>> case ETHTOOL_GET_DUMP_DATA:
>> rc = ethtool_get_dump_data(dev, useraddr);
>> break;
>> + case ETHTOOL_SETRXFCS:
>> + rc = ethtool_set_rx_fcs(dev, useraddr);
>> + break;
>> + case ETHTOOL_GETRXFCS:
>> + rc = ethtool_get_rx_fcs(dev, useraddr);
>> + break;
>
> You can use ethtool_{get,set}_value() rather than adding new trivial
> functions.
I'll look at that.
>
> And as Michal says, this could reasonably be a feature not an entirely
> separate flag. I'm not sure it's that important to have debugging flags
> in features, but I also don't want to have 2 commands per flag...
I'm not sure it really counts as a feature, and I've no desire to tangle
with the effort to extend features beyond 32 bits. Maybe we could have a new
ethtool command that took a struct with two args, so we can "set flag-foo val"
instead of 'enable-flag-foo' and 'disable-flag-foo'?
That should be only one additional method for the drivers to implement, and
can be used for the other patches I have planned as well.
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC 1/2] net: Support getting/setting RX-FCS in drivers.
2011-06-17 15:33 ` Ben Greear
@ 2011-06-17 16:00 ` Ben Hutchings
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ben Hutchings @ 2011-06-17 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ben Greear; +Cc: netdev
On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 08:33 -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
> On 06/17/2011 05:20 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 21:30 -0700, greearb@candelatech.com wrote:
> >> From: Ben Greear<greearb@candelatech.com>
> >>
> >> This will allow us to enable/disable having the Ethernet
> >> frame checksum appended to the skb. Enabling this is
> >> useful when sniffing packets.
> >>
> >> In particular, this can be used to test logic that allows
> >> a NIC to receive all frames, even ones with bad checksums.
[...]
> > And as Michal says, this could reasonably be a feature not an entirely
> > separate flag. I'm not sure it's that important to have debugging flags
> > in features, but I also don't want to have 2 commands per flag...
>
> I'm not sure it really counts as a feature, and I've no desire to tangle
> with the effort to extend features beyond 32 bits.
There are several people wanting to add new flags, so between you I'm
sure you can manage it.
> Maybe we could have a new
> ethtool command that took a struct with two args, so we can "set flag-foo val"
> instead of 'enable-flag-foo' and 'disable-flag-foo'?
>
> That should be only one additional method for the drivers to implement, and
> can be used for the other patches I have planned as well.
Whereas implementing an extra feature toggle now requires zero extra
methods.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-06-17 16:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-06-17 4:30 [RFC 0/2] Allow NICs to pass Frame Checksum up the stack greearb
2011-06-17 4:30 ` [RFC 1/2] net: Support getting/setting RX-FCS in drivers greearb
2011-06-17 7:36 ` Michał Mirosław
2011-06-17 12:20 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-06-17 15:33 ` Ben Greear
2011-06-17 16:00 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-06-17 4:30 ` [RFC 2/2] e100: Support receiving Ethernet FCS greearb
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).