From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Hutchings Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH 0/9] Cleanup and extension of netdev features Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 22:52:03 +0100 Message-ID: <1308693123.2743.71.camel@bwh-desktop> References: <4E011080.7000008@candelatech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_Miros=C5=82aw?= , netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" To: Ben Greear Return-path: Received: from exchange.solarflare.com ([216.237.3.220]:24652 "EHLO exchange.solarflare.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751873Ab1FUVwH convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:52:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4E011080.7000008@candelatech.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 14:43 -0700, Ben Greear wrote: > On 06/20/2011 12:14 PM, Micha=C5=82 Miros=C5=82aw wrote: > > This is a preview of the cleanups pending after getting rid of old > > ethtool ops from remaining drivers. >=20 > Even when skipping patch 1 (seems this was just merged earlier today)= , > these patches do not all apply to net-next. >=20 > They are also full of white-space warnings. >=20 > Please re-post them when you sync against upstream > and I'll try to do some testing. >=20 > Also, do you have a cooresponding patch against ethtool > to make it able to handle the new 64-bit flags? It doesn't handle named features at all yet, though Micha=C5=82 has previously prepared patches to do so. Ben. --=20 Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.