From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH] net_sched: fix dequeuer fairness Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 17:09:54 +0200 Message-ID: <1309100994.2532.35.camel@edumazet-laptop> References: <1309097254.5134.24.camel@mojatatu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: David Miller , Herbert Xu , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: jhs@mojatatu.com Return-path: Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:63003 "EHLO mail-ww0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753926Ab1FZPKD (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Jun 2011 11:10:03 -0400 Received: by wwe5 with SMTP id 5so4093839wwe.1 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 08:10:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1309097254.5134.24.camel@mojatatu> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le dimanche 26 juin 2011 =C3=A0 10:07 -0400, jamal a =C3=A9crit : > Got the 10G intel cards installed finally and repeated > the tests on both dummy and Ixgbe. The unfairness was much=20 > higher with 10G than with dummy. The logs contain the results. >=20 > I could send another patch with stats gathering.=20 > The best place seems to be in net/softnet_stat re-using > the fast route entries. >=20 Hi Jamal I would just remove the jiffies break, now we have a 64 packets limit..= =2E if (quota >=3D work || need_resched()) { ... }