Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
To: amit.salecha@qlogic.com
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, ameen.rahman@qlogic.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH NEXT 1/2] net: add external loopback test in ethtool self test
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 19:28:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1309372139.2714.6.camel@bwh-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1309243247-15950-2-git-send-email-amit.salecha@qlogic.com>

On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 23:40 -0700, amit.salecha@qlogic.com wrote:
> From: Amit Kumar Salecha <amit.salecha@qlogic.com>
> 
> External loopback test can be performed by application without any driver
> support on normal Ethernet cards.
> But on CNA devices, where multiple functions share same physical port.
> Here internal loopback test and external loopback test can be initiated by
> different function at same time. To co exist all functions, firmware need
> to regulate what test can be run by which function. So before performing external
> loopback test, command need to send to firmware, which will quiescent other functions.
> 
> User may not want to run external loopback test always. As special cable need to be
> connected for this test.
> 
> So adding explicit flag in ethtool self test, which will specify interface
> to perform external loopback test.

The trouble with adding flags to enum ethtool_test_flags is that there
is really no general way to tell whether the driver understood the flag.

I think you need to add a second flag which the driver sets to confirm
that it *did* use external loopback.

> Signed-off-by: Amit Kumar Salecha <amit.salecha@qlogic.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/ethtool.h |   13 +++++++++++--
>  1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/ethtool.h b/include/linux/ethtool.h
> index 048d0fa..c2ba287 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ethtool.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ethtool.h
> @@ -310,9 +310,18 @@ struct ethtool_sset_info {
>  				   __u32's, etc. */
>  };
>  
> +/*
> + * Flags definition of ethtool_test
> + *
> + * ETH_TEST_FL_OFFLINE:  online / offline
> + * ETH_TEST_FL_FAILED: test passed / failed
> + * ETH_TEST_FL_EXTERNAL_LB: perform external loopback test
> + */
> +

Replacing the inline comments with a block comment is fine, but please
use kernel-doc format.

Ben.

>  enum ethtool_test_flags {
> -	ETH_TEST_FL_OFFLINE	= (1 << 0),	/* online / offline */
> -	ETH_TEST_FL_FAILED	= (1 << 1),	/* test passed / failed */
> +	ETH_TEST_FL_OFFLINE	= (1 << 0),
> +	ETH_TEST_FL_FAILED	= (1 << 1),
> +	ETH_TEST_FL_EXTERNAL_LB	= (1 << 2),
>  };
>  
>  /* for requesting NIC test and getting results*/

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.


  reply	other threads:[~2011-06-29 18:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-28  6:40 [PATCH NEXT 0/2]net:external loopback support in ethtool amit.salecha
2011-06-28  6:40 ` [PATCH NEXT 1/2] net: add external loopback test in ethtool self test amit.salecha
2011-06-29 18:28   ` Ben Hutchings [this message]
2011-06-30  5:26     ` Amit Salecha
2011-06-28  6:40 ` [PATCH NEXT 2/2] qlcnic: add external loopback support amit.salecha

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1309372139.2714.6.camel@bwh-desktop \
    --to=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
    --cc=ameen.rahman@qlogic.com \
    --cc=amit.salecha@qlogic.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox