From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
To: Sathya.Perla@Emulex.Com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: coding style question on indentation
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 12:52:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1309521158.3093.1670.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3367B80B08154D42A3B2BC708B5D41F63F87EF145E@EXMAIL.ad.emulex.com>
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 04:20 -0700, Sathya.Perla@Emulex.Com wrote:
> Hi,
> Which of the following styling is preferable when a function
> invocation spans more than one line:
>
> a) Aligning the next line with the first argument by inserting a few
> spaces after the tabs - as in:
>
> dma_unmap_page(&adapter->pdev->dev,
> dma_unmap_addr(rx_page_info, bus),
> adapter->big_page_size, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
My preference, for what it's worth.
> Documentation/CodingStyle says "spaces are never used for indentation", but I see
> scripts/Lindent inserting spaces after tabs for alignment.
I think that's meant to apply to indentation at the start of a statement
or declaration, not when wrapping.
> OR
>
> b) Just using tabs without needing to align as above:
>
> dma_unmap_page(&adapter->pdev->dev,
> dma_unmap_addr(rx_page_info, bus),
> adapter->big_page_size, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
Popular but ugly in my opinion.
Some people also use a single extra tab to indent after wrapping,
whether or not the line break is within a parenthesised expression or
argument list.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-01 11:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-01 11:20 coding style question on indentation Sathya.Perla
2011-07-01 11:52 ` Ben Hutchings [this message]
2011-07-01 15:23 ` Joe Perches
2011-07-05 19:54 ` Chris Friesen
2011-07-05 20:01 ` Joe Perches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1309521158.3093.1670.camel@localhost \
--to=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=Sathya.Perla@Emulex.Com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).