From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Hutchings Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] net: remove NETIF_F_NO_CSUM feature Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 01:23:29 +0100 Message-ID: <1310603009.2756.8.camel@bwh-desktop> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_Miros=C5=82aw?= Return-path: Received: from exchange.solarflare.com ([216.237.3.220]:7224 "EHLO exchange.solarflare.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752448Ab1GNAXd convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2011 20:23:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 02:10 +0200, Micha=C5=82 Miros=C5=82aw wrote: > There are no explicit users, so this is now equivalent to NETIF_F_HW_= CSUM. [...] I think this is still a useful distinction, even the networking core currently doesn't care about the difference. Ben. --=20 Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.