From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: filter: BPF 'JIT' compiler for PPC64 Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 22:05:08 +0200 Message-ID: <1311019508.16961.1.camel@edumazet-laptop> References: <4E23E5C3.1070209@ozlabs.org> <1310978375.5756.7.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC> <20110718.124248.1462465498024218250.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: matt@ozlabs.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:50528 "EHLO mail-ww0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750933Ab1GRUFN (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jul 2011 16:05:13 -0400 Received: by wwe5 with SMTP id 5so3515302wwe.1 for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 13:05:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110718.124248.1462465498024218250.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le lundi 18 juillet 2011 =C3=A0 12:42 -0700, David Miller a =C3=A9crit = : > From: Eric Dumazet > Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 10:39:35 +0200 >=20 > > So in PPC SEEN_XREG only is to be set of X is read, not if written. > >=20 > > So you dont have to set SEEN_XREG bit in this part : >=20 > Matt, do you want to integrate changes based upon Eric's feedback > here or do you want me to apply your patch as-is for now? >=20 This was a really minor point, so Matt feel free to ask an immediate inclusion ;)