From: kaber@trash.net
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/8] netfilter: nfnetlink_queue: provide rcu enabled callbacks
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:17:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1311243476-18236-4-git-send-email-kaber@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1311243476-18236-1-git-send-email-kaber@trash.net>
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
nenetlink_queue operations on SMP are not efficent if several queues are
used, because of nfnl_mutex contention when applications give packet
verdict.
Use new call_rcu field in struct nfnl_callback to advertize a callback
that is called under rcu_read_lock instead of nfnl_mutex.
On my 2x4x2 machine, I was able to reach 2.000.000 pps going through
user land returning NF_ACCEPT verdicts without losses, instead of less
than 500.000 pps before patch.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
CC: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
CC: Eric Leblond <eric@regit.org>
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
---
net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c | 41 +++++++++++---------------------------
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c
index b83123f..c645b87 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c
@@ -619,39 +619,26 @@ nfqnl_recv_verdict(struct sock *ctnl, struct sk_buff *skb,
struct nfqnl_instance *queue;
unsigned int verdict;
struct nf_queue_entry *entry;
- int err;
- rcu_read_lock();
queue = instance_lookup(queue_num);
- if (!queue) {
- err = -ENODEV;
- goto err_out_unlock;
- }
+ if (!queue)
+ return -ENODEV;
- if (queue->peer_pid != NETLINK_CB(skb).pid) {
- err = -EPERM;
- goto err_out_unlock;
- }
+ if (queue->peer_pid != NETLINK_CB(skb).pid)
+ return -EPERM;
- if (!nfqa[NFQA_VERDICT_HDR]) {
- err = -EINVAL;
- goto err_out_unlock;
- }
+ if (!nfqa[NFQA_VERDICT_HDR])
+ return -EINVAL;
vhdr = nla_data(nfqa[NFQA_VERDICT_HDR]);
verdict = ntohl(vhdr->verdict);
- if ((verdict & NF_VERDICT_MASK) > NF_MAX_VERDICT) {
- err = -EINVAL;
- goto err_out_unlock;
- }
+ if ((verdict & NF_VERDICT_MASK) > NF_MAX_VERDICT)
+ return -EINVAL;
entry = find_dequeue_entry(queue, ntohl(vhdr->id));
- if (entry == NULL) {
- err = -ENOENT;
- goto err_out_unlock;
- }
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ if (entry == NULL)
+ return -ENOENT;
if (nfqa[NFQA_PAYLOAD]) {
if (nfqnl_mangle(nla_data(nfqa[NFQA_PAYLOAD]),
@@ -664,10 +651,6 @@ nfqnl_recv_verdict(struct sock *ctnl, struct sk_buff *skb,
nf_reinject(entry, verdict);
return 0;
-
-err_out_unlock:
- rcu_read_unlock();
- return err;
}
static int
@@ -780,9 +763,9 @@ err_out_unlock:
}
static const struct nfnl_callback nfqnl_cb[NFQNL_MSG_MAX] = {
- [NFQNL_MSG_PACKET] = { .call = nfqnl_recv_unsupp,
+ [NFQNL_MSG_PACKET] = { .call_rcu = nfqnl_recv_unsupp,
.attr_count = NFQA_MAX, },
- [NFQNL_MSG_VERDICT] = { .call = nfqnl_recv_verdict,
+ [NFQNL_MSG_VERDICT] = { .call_rcu = nfqnl_recv_verdict,
.attr_count = NFQA_MAX,
.policy = nfqa_verdict_policy },
[NFQNL_MSG_CONFIG] = { .call = nfqnl_recv_config,
--
1.7.2.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-21 10:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-21 10:17 [PATCH 0/8] netfilter: netfilter update for net-next kaber
2011-07-21 10:17 ` [PATCH 1/8] netfilter: add SELinux context support to AUDIT target kaber
2011-07-21 10:17 ` [PATCH 2/8] netfilter: nfnetlink: add RCU in nfnetlink_rcv_msg() kaber
2011-07-21 10:17 ` kaber [this message]
2011-07-21 10:17 ` [PATCH 4/8] netfilter: nfnetlink_queue: assert monotonic packet ids kaber
2011-07-21 10:17 ` [PATCH 5/8] netfilter: nfnetlink_queue: batch verdict support kaber
2011-07-21 10:17 ` [PATCH 6/8] netfilter: ipset: make possible to hash some part of the data element only kaber
2011-07-21 10:17 ` [PATCH 7/8] netfilter: ipset: hash:net,iface fixed to handle overlapping nets behind different interfaces kaber
2011-07-21 10:17 ` [PATCH 8/8] netfilter: ipset: fix compiler warnings "'hash_ip4_data_next' declared inline after being called" kaber
2011-07-21 19:50 ` [PATCH 0/8] netfilter: netfilter update for net-next David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1311243476-18236-4-git-send-email-kaber@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).