From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Michal Soltys <soltys@ziu.info>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org,
Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@cyberus.ca>,
lucas.bocchi@gmail.com, Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
631945@bugs.debian.org, 00bormoj@gmail.com,
fdelawarde@wirelessmundi.com
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 39372] New: Problems with HFSC Scheduler
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 16:00:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1311948052.2843.19.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1311946060.2843.15.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC>
Le vendredi 29 juillet 2011 à 15:27 +0200, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> Le vendredi 29 juillet 2011 à 14:29 +0200, Michal Soltys a écrit :
> > On 11-07-15 00:14, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >
> > > (switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via
> > > the bugzilla web interface).
> > >
> > >
> > > Here: WARN_ON(next_time == 0);
> > >
> >
> > From the other thread on netfilter-devel:
> >
> > > On 11-07-22 11:58, Michal Pokrywka wrote: After bisecting 2.6.39.1 it
> > > turned out that the bug is caused independently by two patches:
> > >
> > > commit b262a5da755cc6ed0cb4fba230cd9bf4037e1096 sch_sfq: fix peek()
> > > implementation
> > >
> > > and
> > >
> > > commit 9df49f2bfe862573911a080c75a6d81113c5c81d sch_sfq: avoid giving
> > > spurious NET_XMIT_CN signals
> > >
> > > Reverting these patches makes HFSC work again.
> > >
> >
> > This one (upstream 8efa885406359af300d46910642b50ca82c0fe47) seems to be
> > the culprit (does reverting only that one cures the problem ?)
> >
> > It allows SFQ to return success on enqueuing, when the packet really
> > replaced some other packet in some other flow. This confuses outer qdisc
> > (in this particular case HFSC) which thinks new packet was actually
> > added each time such situation happes.
> >
>
> Technically speaking, _this_ packet was successfuly enqueued.
>
> Returning NET_XMIT_CN or NET_XMIT_SUCCESS should not trigger a bug in
> caller.
>
> > This in turn causes additional dequeues and ends with attempt
> > to schedule non-existent packets, and triggers the warning.
> >
>
> Then its probably a bug in HFSC : It doesnt understand SFQ lost a
> packet.
>
> I'll take a look, thanks for the report.
>
>
Oh well, it seems one qdisc_tree_decrease_qlen(sch, 1) is missing
Maybe following patch would help...
diff --git a/net/sched/sch_sfq.c b/net/sched/sch_sfq.c
index 4536ee6..2a2d287 100644
--- a/net/sched/sch_sfq.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_sfq.c
@@ -410,7 +410,12 @@ sfq_enqueue(struct sk_buff *skb, struct Qdisc *sch)
/* Return Congestion Notification only if we dropped a packet
* from this flow.
*/
- return (qlen != slot->qlen) ? NET_XMIT_CN : NET_XMIT_SUCCESS;
+ if (qlen != slot->qlen)
+ return NET_XMIT_CN;
+
+ /* as we dropped a packet, better let upper stack know this */
+ qdisc_tree_decrease_qlen(sch, 1);
+ return NET_XMIT_SUCCESS;
}
static struct sk_buff *
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-29 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-39372-10286@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2011-07-14 22:14 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 39372] New: Problems with HFSC Scheduler Andrew Morton
2011-07-29 12:29 ` Bug#631945: " Michal Soltys
2011-07-29 13:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-07-29 14:00 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2011-07-29 14:11 ` Patrick McHardy
2011-07-30 5:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-08-01 9:27 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1311948052.2843.19.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=00bormoj@gmail.com \
--cc=631945@bugs.debian.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=fdelawarde@wirelessmundi.com \
--cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=lucas.bocchi@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=soltys@ziu.info \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox