From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: synapse <synapse@hippy.csoma.elte.hu>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PROBLEM: BUG (NULL ptr dereference in ipv4_dst_check)
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 16:36:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1311950184.2843.22.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E32C302.8050304@hippy.csoma.elte.hu>
Le vendredi 29 juillet 2011 à 16:26 +0200, synapse a écrit :
> On 07/29/11 15:33, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > Le vendredi 29 juillet 2011 à 15:18 +0200, synapse a écrit :
> >> Hello guys,
> >>
> >> I have a problem that I hope you can help me resolv. This is my first
> >> real bug report, so please be
> >> patient :)
> >>
> >> ### Description:
> >> 3.0.0-rc4 routinely locks up with BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL
> >> pointer dereference at 000000000000002c
> >> I have an intel sr2600 machine with a 10Gbit interface, it periodically
> >> locks up after a few days.
> >> It serves a lot of traffic. The trace is at the end of the mail.
> >> ###
> >>
> >> ### My efforts:
> >> I've traced the error back from atomic_dec_and_test() to:
> >>
> >> ipv4_dst_check()
> >> check_peer_redir()
> >> neigh_release()
> >> atomic_dec_and_test()
> >>
> >> The parameter to atomic_dec_and_test() is NULL (&neigh->refcnt in
> >> neigh_release), so atomic_dec_and_test()
> >> at /arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h dies at offset 0xffffffff8140f56f.
> >>
> >> ffffffff8140f560: 48 8b 15 19 47 2f 00 mov
> >> 0x2f4719(%rip),%rdx # 0xffffffff81703c80
> >> ffffffff8140f567: 48 89 50 18 mov %rdx,0x18(%rax)
> >> ffffffff8140f56b: 48 8b 7b 40 mov 0x40(%rbx),%rdi
> >> ffffffff8140f56f: f0 ff 4f 2c lock decl 0x2c(%rdi)
> >> ffffffff8140f573: 0f 94 c0 sete %al
> >> ffffffff8140f576: 84 c0 test %al,%al
> >> ffffffff8140f578: 0f 85 ab 00 00 00 jne 0xffffffff8140f629
> >>
> >> From what I've seen is that this code is responsible for pmtu related
> >> things. The refcount member of struct neighbour
> >> is NULL and the neigh pointer (struct neighbour *) in neigh_release() is
> >> not. I have no clue how this might happen,
> >> though I suspect somebody releases the data structure somehow. Note that
> >> this code is invoked when redirect_learned.a4
> >> is set and is different from rt_gateway in ipv4_dst_check().
> >>
> >> Is it possible that two packets go to two different cores for processing
> >> and one core invalidates the rt entry
> >> the other is currently working on (meaning the second will try to
> >> dereference a NULL ptr)?
> >> ###
> >>
> >>
> >> This is just my clumsy attempt at tracking this down, I'm not a kernel
> >> expert unfortunately. I'm happy to provide
> >> further info on the matter. If I'm completely on the wrong track please
> >> let me know.
> >>
> >> Thank you for any help,
> >> Gergely Kalman
> >>
> > This bug was probably already fixed.
> >
> > Please try current linux tree
> >
> >
> found no relevant things in the diffs, except for a check against
> DST_NOCOUNT
> when calling dst_entries_add(opc, 1). Will try with the new kernel, but
> unfortunately
> it might take days to reproduce.
Hmm, I'll take a look, but check_peer_redir() seems suspicious at first
glance.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-29 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-29 13:18 PROBLEM: BUG (NULL ptr dereference in ipv4_dst_check) synapse
2011-07-29 13:33 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-07-29 14:26 ` synapse
2011-07-29 14:36 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2011-07-29 14:39 ` David Miller
2011-07-29 14:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-07-29 14:44 ` synapse
2011-07-29 15:11 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-07-29 15:19 ` David Miller
2011-07-29 15:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-07-30 5:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-08-01 8:57 ` synapse
2011-08-01 9:15 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-08-01 15:25 ` synapse
2011-08-03 10:34 ` David Miller
2011-08-08 13:08 ` synapse
2011-08-09 6:56 ` [PATCH] net: fix potential neighbour race in dst_ifdown() Eric Dumazet
2011-08-10 4:47 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1311950184.2843.22.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=synapse@hippy.csoma.elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).