From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robin Holt Subject: [PATCH v12 0/6] flexcan/powerpc: Add support for powerpc flexcan (freescale p1010) Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 11:07:05 -0500 Message-ID: <1313078831-2511-1-git-send-email-holt@sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: socketcan-core-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, PPC list , Marc Kleine-Budde To: Robin Holt , Kumar Gala , Wolfgang Grandegger , Marc Kleine-Budde , U Bhaskar-B22300 Return-path: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: socketcan-core-bounces-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org Errors-To: socketcan-core-bounces-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org With all the patches applied, my p1010rdb works for communicating between its two can ports and also can communicate with an external PSOC. I have done no testing beyond compile testing for an arm system as I have no access to an arm based system. With the latest version, changes to the arch tree really only reflect changes in the drivers/net/can tree. I, therefore, believe it is probably best to route them through David S. Miller's netdev tree. Wolfgang and Kumar, does that seem correct to you? Thanks, Robin Holt