From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [BUG] tcp : how many times a frame can possibly be retransmitted ? Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 21:45:32 +0200 Message-ID: <1314215132.2506.7.camel@edumazet-laptop> References: <1314202918.2296.39.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC> <3482698A-C35B-4BED-AEEF-EBA135991705@comsys.rwth-aachen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: netdev , Jerry Chu , Lukowski Damian , Hannemann Arnd To: Alexander Zimmermann Return-path: Received: from mail-wy0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:64417 "EHLO mail-wy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751946Ab1HXTph (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Aug 2011 15:45:37 -0400 Received: by wyg24 with SMTP id 24so1115509wyg.19 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 12:45:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3482698A-C35B-4BED-AEEF-EBA135991705@comsys.rwth-aachen.de> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le mercredi 24 ao=C3=BBt 2011 =C3=A0 21:03 +0200, Alexander Zimmermann = a =C3=A9crit : > Hi Eric, >=20 > Am 24.08.2011 um 18:21 schrieb Eric Dumazet: >=20 > > On one dev machine running net-next, I just found strange tcp sessi= ons > > that retransmit a frame forever (The other peer disappeared) >=20 > not forever... > If remember correctly you will stop after 120s. >=20 Hi Alexander I just tried again one session, and got much more delay than that. It stops because of a side effect, "icsk_retransmits" being a 8bit field. Every 256 retransmits, it becomes 255+1 -> 0 retransmits_timed_out() immediately returns false. And backoff increases at this time. Eventually, we retransmit 256*15 times, process 256*15 ICMP messages. Thanks