From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [net-next 10/12] bna: TX Queue Depth Fix Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 06:46:00 +0200 Message-ID: <1314765960.11043.3.camel@edumazet-laptop> References: <1314754068-31978-1-git-send-email-rmody@brocade.com> <1314754068-31978-11-git-send-email-rmody@brocade.com> <1314764670.2556.23.camel@edumazet-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Rasesh Mody , davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, adapter_linux_open_src_team@brocade.com, Gurunatha Karaje To: Dave Taht Return-path: Received: from mail-wy0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:63412 "EHLO mail-wy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750931Ab1HaEqI (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Aug 2011 00:46:08 -0400 Received: by wyg24 with SMTP id 24so222924wyg.19 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 21:46:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le mardi 30 ao=C3=BBt 2011 =C3=A0 21:34 -0700, Dave Taht a =C3=A9crit : > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > BNAD_MAX_Q_DEPTH is now defined but not used. > > > > BTW, 32768 slots in a RX queue is insane. >=20 > As that is many lunar distances worth of buffering... Are they > expecting transmissions from mars? >=20 At 10GB rate, this can be filled in ~2msec with small frames. Apparently some people business depend on not losing frames. But they should be warned of extra memory needs, and latency increases (because of a larger working set)