public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Cc: rongqing.li@windriver.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Define security_sk_getsecctx
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 14:46:01 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1314816361.6850.51.camel@moss-pluto> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E5E568A.4050407@schaufler-ca.com>

On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 08:43 -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> On 8/31/2011 1:36 AM, rongqing.li@windriver.com wrote:
> > From: Roy.Li <rongqing.li@windriver.com>
> >
> > Define security_sk_getsecctx to return the security
> > context of a sock.
> 
> So, what is the intended use of the information
> coming from this hook? If I wanted to write the
> Smack hook, which of the "contexts" would I want
> to return? There are potentially three. If I know
> what the caller is looking for, I can (hopefully)
> select the correct information.

The initial use case is for netstat -Z so that it can reliably show the
security context of the socket rather than inferring it from the owning
process, which can be inaccurate for security-aware applications.

In your situation, when in != out, which would you rather see in netstat
-Z output?  Alternatively, if you want them both, perhaps you could
combine in and out into a single string that is returned, similar to
what you proposed for handling multiple xattrs with inode_getsecctx()?

-- 
Stephen Smalley
National Security Agency


  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-31 18:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-31  8:36 [PATCH 0/2] Dump the sock's security context rongqing.li
2011-08-31  8:36 ` [PATCH 1/2] Define security_sk_getsecctx rongqing.li
2011-08-31 15:43   ` Casey Schaufler
2011-08-31 18:46     ` Stephen Smalley [this message]
2011-08-31 20:49       ` Casey Schaufler
2011-08-31  8:36 ` [PATCH 2/2] Add a netlink attribute INET_DIAG_SECCTX rongqing.li
2011-08-31 12:08   ` Stephen Smalley
2011-08-31 21:18   ` Paul Moore
2011-09-01  9:33     ` Rongqing Li
2011-09-01 12:28       ` Paul Moore
2011-09-05  0:32         ` Rongqing Li
2011-08-31  8:38 ` [PATCH 0/2] Dump the sock's security context Rongqing Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1314816361.6850.51.camel@moss-pluto \
    --to=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rongqing.li@windriver.com \
    --cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox