From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: unalias tcp_skb_cb flags and ip_dsfield Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 10:01:46 +0200 Message-ID: <1317110506.2541.1.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC> References: <1316757739.2560.12.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1317103249.2796.25.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20110927.022025.1306291417181821045.davem@davemloft.net> <201109271037.38786.christoph.paasch@uclouvain.be> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org, hkchu@google.com, ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi, jhs@mojatatu.com To: christoph.paasch@uclouvain.be Return-path: Received: from mail-yi0-f46.google.com ([209.85.218.46]:51425 "EHLO mail-yi0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751766Ab1I0IBf (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Sep 2011 04:01:35 -0400 Received: by yib18 with SMTP id 18so4977615yib.19 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 01:01:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201109271037.38786.christoph.paasch@uclouvain.be> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le mardi 27 septembre 2011 =C3=A0 10:37 +0300, Christoph Paasch a =C3=A9= crit : > Hi, >=20 > I realize that before "struct tcp_skb_cb" is a comment saying that it= 's 44=20 > bytes long. >=20 > However, (as far as I can see) before Eric's change it was 42 bytes l= ong and=20 > now it became 43 bytes. >=20 > Wouldn't it make sense to change the comment, so that it's consistent= again=20 > with the real size of tcp_skb_cb ? You are mistaken :) There was a two bytes hole. I took one byte for dsfield, and left one byte hole, I added a comment to remind there is this hole Thanks !