From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [BUG] igb : rtnl assert on resume Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2011 21:29:52 +0200 Message-ID: <1318102192.5276.27.camel@edumazet-laptop> References: <1318096284.5276.25.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1318098396.23688.169.camel@jtkirshe-mobl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: David Miller , netdev To: jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com Return-path: Received: from mail-wy0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:34726 "EHLO mail-wy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753789Ab1JHT35 (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Oct 2011 15:29:57 -0400 Received: by wyg34 with SMTP id 34so4825852wyg.19 for ; Sat, 08 Oct 2011 12:29:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1318098396.23688.169.camel@jtkirshe-mobl> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le samedi 08 octobre 2011 =C3=A0 11:26 -0700, Jeff Kirsher a =C3=A9crit= : > Any chance you can pull my net-next tree Eric to verify if the issue > still exists? Sure, I'll do that. In the meantime, I upgraded my (slow, old) machine to ubuntu 11.11, and reproduced the problem on their 3.0.something kernel. >=20 > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jkirsher/net-next.git >=20 > I currently have 11 igb patches on that tree (which I recently > submitted) that are not in Dave's tree yet. >=20 > There have been a number of cleanup's recently, so while this is not > expected, I am not surprised at the same time since I am in the middl= e > of the update to igb. >=20 > We have not seen this on my local tree (which has the 11 patches plus > 4-5 more patches for igb). Almost all of them are > cleanup's/re-organizing of igb, so nothing specific to the issue you > have seen. Thanks