From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [BUG] igb : rtnl assert on resume Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2011 22:16:40 +0200 Message-ID: <1318105000.5276.29.camel@edumazet-laptop> References: <1318096284.5276.25.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1318098396.23688.169.camel@jtkirshe-mobl> <1318102192.5276.27.camel@edumazet-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: David Miller , netdev To: jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com Return-path: Received: from mail-wy0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:51903 "EHLO mail-wy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753878Ab1JHUQo (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Oct 2011 16:16:44 -0400 Received: by wyg34 with SMTP id 34so4841552wyg.19 for ; Sat, 08 Oct 2011 13:16:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1318102192.5276.27.camel@edumazet-laptop> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le samedi 08 octobre 2011 =C3=A0 21:29 +0200, Eric Dumazet a =C3=A9crit= : > Le samedi 08 octobre 2011 =C3=A0 11:26 -0700, Jeff Kirsher a =C3=A9cr= it : >=20 > > Any chance you can pull my net-next tree Eric to verify if the issu= e > > still exists? >=20 > Sure, I'll do that. >=20 Same error with your changes as well. No hurry, maybe the RTNL assert can be relaxed.