From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Perches Subject: Re: [net-next 6/6] ixgbe: change the eeprom version reported by ethtool Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:57:15 -0700 Message-ID: <1318867035.5407.5.camel@Joe-Laptop> References: <1318854062-3628-1-git-send-email-jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> <1318854062-3628-7-git-send-email-jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: davem@davemloft.net, Emil Tantilov , netdev@vger.kernel.org, gospo@redhat.com, sassmann@redhat.com To: Jeff Kirsher Return-path: Received: from perches-mx.perches.com ([206.117.179.246]:59064 "EHLO labridge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756371Ab1JQP5Q (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Oct 2011 11:57:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1318854062-3628-7-git-send-email-jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 05:21 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote: > From: Emil Tantilov > > Use 32bit value starting at offset 0x2d for displaying the firmware > version in ethtool. This should work for all current ixgbe HW [] > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethtool.c [] > - snprintf(firmware_version, sizeof(firmware_version), "%d.%d-%d", > - (adapter->eeprom_version & 0xF000) >> 12, > - (adapter->eeprom_version & 0x0FF0) >> 4, > - adapter->eeprom_version & 0x000F); > + nvm_track_id = (adapter->eeprom_verh << 16) | > + adapter->eeprom_verl; > + snprintf(firmware_version, sizeof(firmware_version), "0x%08x", > + nvm_track_id); Is ethtool output like proc output considered an abi that should not be changed?