From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: RE: IPv6 routing requests ignore NLM_F_CREATE and NLM_F_REPLACE Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 08:54:28 +0200 Message-ID: <1318920868.2571.52.camel@edumazet-laptop> References: <82C9FC7ED59434458AD4E09AFF2DE230B534F9@FIESEXC006.nsn-intra.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: "Vaittinen, Matti (EXT-Other - FI/Oulu)" Return-path: Received: from mail-wy0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:41036 "EHLO mail-wy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751320Ab1JRGyc (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Oct 2011 02:54:32 -0400 Received: by wyg36 with SMTP id 36so237039wyg.19 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 23:54:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <82C9FC7ED59434458AD4E09AFF2DE230B534F9@FIESEXC006.nsn-intra.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le mardi 18 octobre 2011 =C3=A0 09:02 +0300, Vaittinen, Matti (EXT-Othe= r - =46I/Oulu) a =C3=A9crit : > Hi again. >=20 =2E.. > I do not intend pushing this topic but is this the correct list to as= k > this? Is there something I could clarify regarding my question? If th= is > is not correct list, could someone please point me the right one. >=20 Well, this is the correct list. And yes, please send us a patch. IPv6 lacks some features found in IPv4, not on purpose, but because nobody wanted them or had the time to implement them.