From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: Quick Fair Queue scheduler maturity and examples Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 13:59:32 +0200 Message-ID: <1319716772.2601.26.camel@edumazet-laptop> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Karel Rericha Return-path: Received: from mail-gx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.161.174]:50502 "EHLO mail-gx0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754299Ab1J0L7q (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Oct 2011 07:59:46 -0400 Received: by ggnb1 with SMTP id b1so2546611ggn.19 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 04:59:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le jeudi 27 octobre 2011 =C3=A0 13:30 +0200, Karel Rericha a =C3=A9crit= : > Hi list, >=20 > has anyone some experience about QFQ and its maturity ? I was not abl= e > to find anything more than patches and papers, real world examples an= d > info are nonexistent. >=20 At its inclusion time (in linux 3.0), I did many tests and feedback to Stephen. By the way, QFQ is not only patches and papers, its now officially supported by linux netdev team ;) Unfortunately the machine where I kept traces of my qfq scripts was totally lost, no backups.... oh well... Given that not a single patch was added since initial commit, I guess nobody really uses the thing, or its perfect, who knows :) You definitely should be able to use it, and report here problems if any.