From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: jesse@nicira.com, john.r.fastabend@intel.com,
hans.schillstrom@ericsson.com, jpirko@redhat.com,
mbizon@freebox.fr, netdev@vger.kernel.org, fubar@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH] net: allow vlan traffic to be received under bond
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 13:06:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1319799986.23112.101.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1319796053.23112.92.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Le vendredi 28 octobre 2011 à 12:00 +0200, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> Oh well, this broke my setup, a very basic one.
>
> eth1 and eth2 on a bonding device, bond0, active-backup
>
> some vlans on top of bond0, say vlan.103
>
> $ ip link show dev vlan.103
> 8: vlan.103@bond0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc
> pfifo_fast state UP qlen 100
> link/ether 00:1e:0b:ec:d3:d2 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>
>
> arp_rcv() now gets packets with skb->type PACKET_OTHERHOST and drops
> such packets.
>
> [000] 52870.115435: skb_gro_reset_offset <-napi_gro_receive
> [000] 52870.115435: dev_gro_receive <-napi_gro_receive
> [000] 52870.115435: napi_skb_finish <-napi_gro_receive
> [000] 52870.115435: netif_receive_skb <-napi_skb_finish
> [000] 52870.115435: get_rps_cpu <-netif_receive_skb
> [000] 52870.115435: __netif_receive_skb <-netif_receive_skb
> [000] 52870.115436: vlan_do_receive <-__netif_receive_skb
> [000] 52870.115436: bond_handle_frame <-__netif_receive_skb
> [000] 52870.115436: vlan_do_receive <-__netif_receive_skb
> [000] 52870.115436: arp_rcv <-__netif_receive_skb
> [000] 52870.115436: kfree_skb <-arp_rcv
> [000] 52870.115437: __kfree_skb <-kfree_skb
> [000] 52870.115437: skb_release_head_state <-__kfree_skb
> [000] 52870.115437: skb_release_data <-__kfree_skb
> [000] 52870.115437: kfree <-skb_release_data
> [000] 52870.115437: kmem_cache_free <-__kfree_skb
>
>
> By the way, we have no SNMP counter here so I spent some time to track
> this. I'll send a patch for this.
>
> If this host initiates the trafic, all is well.
>
> Please guys, can we get back ARP or revert this patch ?
Following patch cures the problem, I am not sure its the right fix.
Problem is we dont know how many times vlan_do_receive() can be called
for a packet.
Only last call should set/mess pkt_type to PACKET_OTHERHOST.
So the caller should be responsible for this, not vlan_do_receive()
Alternative would be to check skb->dev->rx_handler being NULL,
but its not clean.
Following patch is a hack because it handles multicast/broadcast trafic
only. Unicast is already handled in lines 26-33, this is why we didnt
catch the problem.
diff --git a/net/8021q/vlan_core.c b/net/8021q/vlan_core.c
index f1f2f7b..6861899 100644
--- a/net/8021q/vlan_core.c
+++ b/net/8021q/vlan_core.c
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ bool vlan_do_receive(struct sk_buff **skbp)
vlan_dev = vlan_find_dev(skb->dev, vlan_id);
if (!vlan_dev) {
- if (vlan_id)
+ if (vlan_id && skb->pkt_type == PACKET_HOST)
skb->pkt_type = PACKET_OTHERHOST;
return false;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-28 11:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-10 19:16 [net-next PATCH] net: allow vlan traffic to be received under bond John Fastabend
2011-10-10 22:37 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-10-11 2:07 ` John Fastabend
2011-10-11 2:43 ` Jesse Gross
2011-10-11 11:08 ` Hans Schillstrom
2011-10-11 13:13 ` John Fastabend
2011-10-13 13:09 ` Hans Schillström
2011-10-11 13:16 ` John Fastabend
2011-10-11 10:57 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-10-13 15:04 ` Maxime Bizon
2011-10-13 15:38 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-10-13 15:48 ` Maxime Bizon
2011-10-13 15:59 ` Hans Schillström
2011-10-13 17:42 ` John Fastabend
2011-10-13 18:23 ` Hans Schillström
2011-10-14 0:22 ` Jesse Gross
2011-10-19 3:47 ` David Miller
2011-10-28 10:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-10-28 11:06 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2011-10-29 2:20 ` John Fastabend
2011-10-29 10:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-10-29 14:59 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-10-29 16:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-10-29 16:13 ` [PATCH v2] vlan: allow nested vlan_do_receive() Eric Dumazet
2011-10-29 16:28 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-10-30 8:38 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-10-30 8:44 ` David Miller
2011-10-30 8:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-10-29 16:16 ` [net-next PATCH] net: allow vlan traffic to be received under bond Jiri Pirko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1319799986.23112.101.camel@edumazet-laptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=hans.schillstrom@ericsson.com \
--cc=jesse@nicira.com \
--cc=john.r.fastabend@intel.com \
--cc=jpirko@redhat.com \
--cc=mbizon@freebox.fr \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox