From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: >Re: [RFC] should VM_BUG_ON(cond) really evaluate cond Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 17:43:04 +0200 Message-ID: <1319902984.2586.35.camel@edumazet-laptop> References: <1319764761.23112.14.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20111028012521.GF25795@one.firstfloor.org> <1319766293.6759.17.camel@deadeye> <1319770376.23112.58.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1319772566.6759.27.camel@deadeye> <1319777025.23112.67.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1319803781.23112.113.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1319813252.23112.122.camel@edumazet-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Ben Hutchings , Andi Kleen , linux-kernel , netdev , Andrew Morton To: Linus Torvalds Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Le vendredi 28 octobre 2011 =C3=A0 07:55 -0700, Linus Torvalds a =C3=A9= crit : > Maybe we should make it a generic helper macro ("ACCESS_AT_MOST_ONCE(= )")? >=20 > Comments? I think I'm open to tested patches.. >=20 I am currently travelling, but can do that Monday/Tuesday if nobody beats me ;)