From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
To: Weiping Pan <wpan@redhat.com>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <fubar@us.ibm.com>,
<andy@greyhouse.net>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bonding:update speed/duplex for NETDEV_CHANGE
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 18:15:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1320084906.2735.9.camel@bwh-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e00468a2cbb8a25d7a89028e876769449454309f.1320070684.git.wpan@redhat.com>
On Mon, 2011-10-31 at 22:19 +0800, Weiping Pan wrote:
> Zheng Liang(lzheng@redhat.com) found a bug that if we config bonding with
> arp monitor, sometimes bonding driver cannot get the speed and duplex from
> its slaves, it will assume them to be 100Mb/sec and Full, please see
> /proc/net/bonding/bond0.
> But there is no such problem when uses miimon.
>
> (Take igb for example)
> I find that the reason is that after dev_open() in bond_enslave(),
> bond_update_speed_duplex() will call igb_get_settings()
> , but in that function,
> it runs ethtool_cmd_speed_set(ecmd, -1); ecmd->duplex = -1;
> because igb get an error value of status.
> So even dev_open() is called, but the device is not really ready to get its
> settings.
>
> Maybe it is safe for us to call igb_get_settings() only after
> this message shows up, that is "igb: p4p1 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex,
> Flow Control: RX".
[...]
For any device with autonegotiation enabled, you generally cannot get
the speed and duplex settings until the link is up. While the link is
down, you may see a value of 0, ~0, or the best mode currently
advertised. So I think that the bonding driver should avoid updating
the slave speed and duplex values whenever autoneg is enabled and the
link is down.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-31 18:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-31 2:53 When can a net device get its setting correctly ? WeipingPan
2011-10-31 14:19 ` [PATCH] bonding:update speed/duplex for NETDEV_CHANGE Weiping Pan
2011-10-31 18:15 ` Ben Hutchings [this message]
2011-10-31 20:32 ` Jay Vosburgh
2011-10-31 20:48 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-10-31 21:23 ` Jay Vosburgh
2011-10-31 22:41 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-11-01 3:20 ` Weiping Pan
2011-11-01 21:53 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1320084906.2735.9.camel@bwh-desktop \
--to=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wpan@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).