From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: Regarding Routing table in Linux kernel Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 07:21:29 +0100 Message-ID: <1320646889.6506.46.camel@edumazet-laptop> References: <1320601372.6506.11.camel@edumazet-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Ajith Adapa Return-path: Received: from mail-wy0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:61359 "EHLO mail-wy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751681Ab1KGGVd (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Nov 2011 01:21:33 -0500 Received: by wyh15 with SMTP id 15so4131828wyh.19 for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 22:21:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le lundi 07 novembre 2011 =C3=A0 09:52 +0530, Ajith Adapa a =C3=A9crit = : > I will check it with the latest kernel. Actually I am just checking i= n > a 2.6.18 kernel. >=20 2.6.18 is very old in this respect. Lot of things changed in recent kernels in route cache handling. We no longer have long pauses because of garbage collector runs.