From: Manavalan Krishnan <manavalan_k@yahoo.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Large file copy to NFS mounted directory causes delay in other application packets
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 00:13:09 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1320826389.47194.YahooMailNeo@web160716.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1320819875.26025.48.camel@edumazet-laptop>
(1) NFS is using TCP
(2) yes eth0 is dedicated to heartbeat and eth1 is dedicated to NFS
(3) I notice the following at the system where file copy is occuring
The kernel Recv-Q of the heartbeat application socket grows but not delivered to the socket recv call.
Here is the netstat output.
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address
udp 11522 0 *:23435 *:*
As soon as I stop the file transfer, the socket recv call receives the packets and Recv-Q goes 0.
(4) The server has 4 cpu cores and 25G RAM
________________________________
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Manavalan Krishnan <manavalan_k@yahoo.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 8, 2011 10:24 PM
Subject: Re: Large file copy to NFS mounted directory causes delay in other application packets
Le mardi 08 novembre 2011 à 21:28 -0800, Manavalan Krishnan a écrit :
> Hi All
>
> I have two systems with two network interfaces each(eth0 and eth1). I
> am running linux-HA (heartbeat deamon) on both the systems and they
> use eth0 for exchanging heartbeats. I have NFS mounted directory in
> one system and the NFS client uses the interface eth1.
>
> I try to copy a large file to NFS mounted directory. But the heartbeat
> daemons misses the heartbeat packets from peers while copy is under
> progress. I did tcpdump and found that the heartbeat packets are
> delayed for few seconds before sent out on eth0. When I stop the file
> copy, the heartbeats are delivered properly. It seems linux kernel
> somehow giving priority for NFS packets(generated from the file copy)
> over other application packets.
>
> Any thoughts on this behavior? Is there any way we can avoid this so
> that application packets get equal chance while large file copy to NFS
> mounted directory under progress?
>
CC netdev
1) Is your NFS using UDP or TCP ?
2) Is your eth0 dedicated to heartbeats and eth1 to NFS traffic ?
3) How do you know heartbeats are delayed ?
4) Is your server CPU bounded ?
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-09 8:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1320816503.73813.YahooMailNeo@web160718.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
2011-11-09 6:24 ` Large file copy to NFS mounted directory causes delay in other application packets Eric Dumazet
2011-11-09 8:13 ` Manavalan Krishnan [this message]
2011-11-09 8:59 ` Eric Dumazet
[not found] ` <CAA93jw4gDuHyG508zxRzyn+MJ4gL5m958OaCWJxoDsaLgjdnqg@mail.gmail.com>
2011-11-09 8:42 ` Manavalan Krishnan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1320826389.47194.YahooMailNeo@web160716.mail.bf1.yahoo.com \
--to=manavalan_k@yahoo.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox