From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
To: "Michał Mirosław" <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] net: verify GSO flag bits against netdev features
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 00:09:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1321488596.2709.68.camel@bwh-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d4513ed885d62d13873f9b7310fc20cbfa55f634.1321488025.git.mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 01:05 +0100, Michał Mirosław wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
> ---
> include/linux/netdevice.h | 9 +++++++++
> 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> index b35ffd7..31da3bb 100644
> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> @@ -2492,6 +2492,15 @@ netdev_features_t netif_skb_features(struct sk_buff *skb);
> static inline int net_gso_ok(netdev_features_t features, int gso_type)
> {
> netdev_features_t feature = gso_type << NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT;
> +
> + /* check flags correspondence */
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_TCPV4 != (NETIF_F_TSO >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT));
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_UDP != (NETIF_F_UFO >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT));
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_DODGY != (NETIF_F_GSO_ROBUST >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT));
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_TCP_ECN != (NETIF_F_TSO_ECN >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT));
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_TCPV6 != (NETIF_F_TSO6 >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT));
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_FCOE != (NETIF_F_FSO >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT));
> +
> return (features & feature) == feature;
> }
This is fine but should still be done at the same time as changing the
definitions.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-17 0:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-17 0:05 [PATCH 1/2] net: drivers: use bool type instead of double negation Michał Mirosław
2011-11-17 0:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] net: verify GSO flag bits against netdev features Michał Mirosław
2011-11-17 0:09 ` Ben Hutchings [this message]
2011-11-17 0:13 ` Michał Mirosław
2011-11-17 0:35 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-11-17 1:41 ` David Miller
2011-11-17 1:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] net: drivers: use bool type instead of double negation David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1321488596.2709.68.camel@bwh-desktop \
--to=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).