From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Hutchings Subject: Re: under-performing bonded interfaces Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 00:57:29 +0000 Message-ID: <1321491449.2709.90.camel@bwh-desktop> References: <4EC44ECB.4050201@candelatech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Ben Greear , To: Simon Chen Return-path: Received: from exchange.solarflare.com ([216.237.3.220]:45056 "EHLO exchange.solarflare.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754067Ab1KQA5d (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2011 19:57:33 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 19:05 -0500, Simon Chen wrote: > If used independently, I can get around 9.8Gbps. [...] > [ 11.572861] ixgbe 0000:03:00.0: (PCI Express:5.0Gb/s:Width x4) e8:9a:8f:23:42:1a [...] You need a PCIe 2.0 x8 slot to run 2 10 Gb ports at full speed. An x4 slot is only good for about 12-13 Gb aggregate throughput (dependent on packet sizes and other details). Ben. -- Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.