From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
<xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Don't allow sharing of tx skbs on xen-netfront
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 15:20:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1321543238.3664.278.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1321298544-16434-1-git-send-email-nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 14:22 -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
> It was pointed out to me recently that the xen-netfront driver can't safely
> support shared skbs on transmit, since, while it doesn't maintain skb state
> directly, it does pass a pointer to the skb to the hypervisor via a list, and
> the hypervisor may expect the contents of the skb to remain stable. Clearing
> the IFF_TX_SKB_SHARING flag after the call to alloc_etherdev to make it safe.
What are the actual constraints here? The skb is used as a handle to the
skb->data and shinfo (frags) and to complete at the end. It's actually
those which are passed to the hypervisor (effectively the same as
passing those addresses to the h/w for DMA).
Which parts of the skb are expected/allowed to not remain stable?
(Appologies if the above seems naive, I seem to have missed the
introduction of shared tx skbs and IFF_TX_SKB_SHARING)
Ian.
>
> Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
> CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
> CC: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
> CC: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
> CC: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> ---
> drivers/net/xen-netfront.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c b/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
> index 226faab..fb1077b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
> @@ -1252,6 +1252,12 @@ static struct net_device * __devinit xennet_create_dev(struct xenbus_device *dev
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Since frames remain on a queue after a return from xennet_start_xmit,
> + * we can't support tx shared skbs
> + */
> + netdev->priv_flags &= ~IFF_TX_SKB_SHARING;
> +
> np = netdev_priv(netdev);
> np->xbdev = dev;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-17 15:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-14 19:22 [PATCH] Don't allow sharing of tx skbs on xen-netfront Neil Horman
2011-11-14 19:27 ` David Miller
2011-11-14 19:32 ` Neil Horman
2011-11-17 15:20 ` Ian Campbell [this message]
2011-11-17 19:25 ` Neil Horman
2011-11-17 20:17 ` Ian Campbell
2011-11-17 20:45 ` Neil Horman
2011-11-18 10:30 ` Ian Campbell
2011-11-18 11:48 ` Neil Horman
2011-11-18 11:53 ` Ian Campbell
2011-11-18 12:09 ` Neil Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1321543238.3664.278.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com \
--to=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox