Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Problems with dropped packets on bonded interface for 3.x kernels
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 07:32:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1321857123.17419.2.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111121051603.GB3702@china>

Le dimanche 20 novembre 2011 à 23:16 -0600, Albert Chin a écrit :
> I'm running Ubuntu 11.10 on an Intel SR2625URLXR system with an Intel
> S5520UR motherboard and an internal Intel E1G44HT (I340-T4) Quad Port
> Server Adapter. I am seeing dropped packets on a bonded interface,
> comprised of two GigE ports on the Intel E1G44HT Quad Port Server
> Adapter. The following kernels exhibit this problem:
>   3.0.0-12-server, 3.0.0-13-server, 3.1.0-2-server, 3.2.0-rc2
> Installing Fedora 16 with a 3.1.1-1.fc16.x86_64 also showed dropped
> packets.
> 
> I also tried RHEL6 with a 2.6.32-131.17.1.el6.x86_64 kernel and didn't
> see any dropped packets. Testing an older 2.6.32-28.55-generic Ubuntu
> kernel also didn't show any dropped packets.
> 
> So, with 2.6, I don't see dropped packets, but everything including
> 3.0 and after show dropped packets.
> 
> # ifconfig bond0
> bond0     Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:1b:21:d3:f6:0a  
>           inet6 addr: fe80::21b:21ff:fed3:f60a/64 Scope:Link
>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MASTER MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:225 errors:0 dropped:186 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:231 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 
>           RX bytes:25450 (25.4 KB)  TX bytes:28368 (28.3 KB)
> 
> With lacp_rate=fast, I see higher packet loss than with
> lacp_rate=slow. I've tried bonding t
> 
> This server has the following network controllers for the two internal
> NICs:
>   # lspci -vv
>   01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82575EB Gigabit Network Connection (rev 02)
>   01:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82575EB Gigabit Network Connection (rev 02)
> 
> And it has the following network controllers for the four NICs on the
> I340-T4 PCI-E card:
>   # lspci -vv
>   0a:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82580 Gigabit Network Connection (rev 01)
>   0a:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82580 Gigabit Network Connection (rev 01)
>   0a:00.2 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82580 Gigabit Network Connection (rev 01)
>   0a:00.3 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82580 Gigabit Network Connection (rev 01)
> 
> I tried bonding the two 82575EB NICs rather than two NICs on the 82580
> but see the same dropped packet issue.
> 
> I have replaced the cables, tested each port individually on the
> switch without bonding, and don't see any reason to expect hardware as
> the issue. The switch is a Summit Extreme 400-48t.
> 
> I am using a 802.3ad configuration:
> # cat /proc/net/bonding/bond0
> Ethernet Channel Bonding Driver: v3.7.1 (April 27, 2011)
> 
> Bonding Mode: IEEE 802.3ad Dynamic link aggregation
> Transmit Hash Policy: layer2 (0)
> MII Status: up
> MII Polling Interval (ms): 100
> Up Delay (ms): 200
> Down Delay (ms): 0
> 
> 802.3ad info
> LACP rate: fast
> Aggregator selection policy (ad_select): stable
> Active Aggregator Info:
>         Aggregator ID: 1
>         Number of ports: 1
>         Actor Key: 17
>         Partner Key: 24
>         Partner Mac Address: 00:04:96:18:54:d5
> 
> Slave Interface: eth4
> MII Status: up
> Speed: 1000 Mbps
> Duplex: full
> Link Failure Count: 0
> Permanent HW addr: 00:1b:21:d3:f6:0a
> Aggregator ID: 1
> Slave queue ID: 0
> 
> Slave Interface: eth5
> MII Status: up
> Speed: 1000 Mbps
> Duplex: full
> Link Failure Count: 0
> Permanent HW addr: 00:1b:21:d3:f6:0b
> Aggregator ID: 2
> Slave queue ID: 0
> 
> Anyone have any ideas?
> 

Old kernels were dropping some packets (unknown protocols...) without
counting them.

So following patch was added in 2.6.37 :

You could use tcdpump to identify what are these dropped packets :)

commit caf586e5f23cebb2a68cbaf288d59dbbf2d74052
Author: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu Sep 30 21:06:55 2010 +0000

    net: add a core netdev->rx_dropped counter
    
    In various situations, a device provides a packet to our stack and we
    drop it before it enters protocol stack :
    - softnet backlog full (accounted in /proc/net/softnet_stat)
    - bad vlan tag (not accounted)
    - unknown/unregistered protocol (not accounted)
    
    We can handle a per-device counter of such dropped frames at core level,
    and automatically adds it to the device provided stats (rx_dropped), so
    that standard tools can be used (ifconfig, ip link, cat /proc/net/dev)
    
    This is a generalization of commit 8990f468a (net: rx_dropped
    accounting), thus reverting it.
    
    Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
    Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-11-21  6:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-21  5:16 Problems with dropped packets on bonded interface for 3.x kernels Albert Chin
2011-11-21  6:32 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2011-11-21  7:44   ` Albert Chin
2011-11-21  8:02     ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-21  8:08       ` Albert Chin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1321857123.17419.2.camel@edumazet-laptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox