From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: (repost) vhost tree for linux-next Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 08:00:08 -0600 Message-ID: <1322402408.2992.4.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> References: <20111124203843.GC4873@redhat.com> <20111127124816.GA23270@redhat.com> <1322401139.2992.1.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> <20111127135916.GB23302@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20111127135916.GB23302@redhat.com> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2011-11-27 at 15:59 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 07:38:59AM -0600, James Bottomley wrote: > > On Sun, 2011-11-27 at 14:48 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > I normally merge things through Dave, Rusty, Jesse or Jens, > > > not directly to Linus. However, sometimes there's a large change > > > (for example, my recent RFC for pci_iomap changes) > > > where estimating how it interacts with other platforms and planned > > > changes in the next kernel would be beneficial. > > > > > > For this purpose, it would be helpful if my tree were added to linux-next. > > > The tree is: > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git linux-next > > > > > > Could you do this please? > > > (The current contents of that tree was posted for review/feedback > > > for the first time today. It might make sense to give it a few days > > > for any responses ...) > > > > I'm a little confused by your to: field. This is a linux-arch issue, > > isn't it, since it's altering architecture implementations of a PCI > > function rather than altering anything in SCSI or net? > > > > James > > Yes. Stephen Rothwell asked me to Cc widely to see if anyone > objects to picking this stuff in linux-next. > Sorry about any confusion. I;m fine with that, but the fact that you didn't send it to linux-arch was more my point ... James