From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Hutchings Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/10] net: Add netdev interfaces recording send/compl Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 17:49:51 +0000 Message-ID: <1322502591.26733.8.camel@bwh-desktop> References: <20111123094614.36560215@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> <20111123.185812.1721878183759040757.davem@davemloft.net> <20111123160320.76143e3b@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> <20111123.190623.2026426589805797580.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , , To: Tom Herbert Return-path: Received: from mail.solarflare.com ([216.237.3.220]:12697 "EHLO ocex02.SolarFlarecom.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753437Ab1K1Rtz (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Nov 2011 12:49:55 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 16:32 -0800, Tom Herbert wrote: > >> I was referring to the transmit routine, there for netdev_sent_queue() > >> is always called with one packet. > > > > Optimism for the future? :-) > > > > Yep, I am looking forward to the day that someone figures out how to > batch transmits in a meaningful way! [...] UFO/TSO do something like that. Should we count physical or logical packets? Ben. -- Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.