From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] netstamp_needed shouldn't be jump_label_key Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 22:45:45 +0100 Message-ID: <1322516745.2970.26.camel@edumazet-laptop> References: <1322511796-6908-1-git-send-email-igorm@etf.rs> <1322511796-6908-2-git-send-email-igorm@etf.rs> <1322512426.2970.15.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1322515010.2970.24.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20111128133142.46998873@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: igorm@etf.rs, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Hemminger Return-path: Received: from mail-bw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:37764 "EHLO mail-bw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751796Ab1K1Vpu (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Nov 2011 16:45:50 -0500 Received: by bke11 with SMTP id 11so9103218bke.19 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 13:45:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20111128133142.46998873@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le lundi 28 novembre 2011 =C3=A0 13:31 -0800, Stephen Hemminger a =C3=A9= crit : > Why not just change the jump_label_key to a spin_lock? I can't see th= at it is held > long enough to make mutex of any benefit. Because some arches want to use mutex in their arch_jump_label_transform() or text_poke_smp()