From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Denys Fedoryshchenko <denys@visp.net.lb>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SYN attack, with FIN flag set
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2011 08:27:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1322897233.2762.79.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1755dc626dee301261ef4fe4cd66fd47@visp.net.lb>
Le samedi 03 décembre 2011 à 00:29 +0200, Denys Fedoryshchenko a écrit :
> Hi
>
> Recently i started to get SYN attacks, and managed them.
> syncookies didn't helped, here is "perf report" info:
> - 26.89% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] _raw_spin_lock
> - _raw_spin_lock
> - 94.97% tcp_v4_rcv
> ip_local_deliver_finish
> ip_local_deliver
> ip_rcv_finish
> ip_rcv
> __netif_receive_skb
> process_backlog
> net_rx_action
> __do_softirq
> call_softirq
> do_softirq
> + irq_exit
>
> But then i got attack that made server to choke and bypassed "--syn"
> rule, and i was surprised, that stack are handling invalid combination
> of flags, SYN+FIN.
> Is it valid behaviour?
>
> in tcp_input.c, tcp_rcv_state_process(), it just does check for rst (to
> discard), but maybe packet with fin set should be discarded too?
I believe netfilter tcp conntrack considers SYN|FIN as INVALID
Yes, we could drop SYN|FIN messages, but what prevents attacker to just
use SYN messages to attack your machine ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-03 7:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-02 22:29 SYN attack, with FIN flag set Denys Fedoryshchenko
2011-12-03 7:27 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2011-12-03 7:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-12-03 8:18 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2011-12-03 8:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-12-03 9:03 ` Michael Tokarev
2011-12-03 9:07 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2011-12-03 9:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-12-03 10:02 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-12-03 18:40 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2011-12-04 6:26 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1322897233.2762.79.camel@edumazet-laptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=denys@visp.net.lb \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox