netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: "John A. Sullivan III" <jsullivan@opensourcedevel.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Latency difference between fifo and pfifo_fast
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 07:02:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1323151377.2467.13.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <30c2e9e0-4208-4c19-9e43-31f95e13575d@jasiiieee>

Le lundi 05 décembre 2011 à 23:10 -0500, John A. Sullivan III a écrit :
> Hello, all.  We are trying to minimize latency on our iSCSI SAN.  The
> network is entirely dedicated to the iSCSI traffic.  Since all the
> traffic is the same, would it make sense to change the qdisc for that
> interface to fifo from the default pfifo_fast or is the latency
> difference between the two completely negligible? Thanks - John

A very small difference indeed. How many packets per second are
expected ? What kind of NIC are you using ?

  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-06  6:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <8f05fdb0-6e4c-4adf-b8d1-bd67a0dc114f@jasiiieee>
2011-12-06  4:10 ` Latency difference between fifo and pfifo_fast John A. Sullivan III
2011-12-06  6:02   ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2011-12-06  6:29     ` Eric Dumazet
2011-12-06  8:39       ` John A. Sullivan III
2011-12-06  8:51         ` Eric Dumazet
2011-12-06 18:20           ` Rick Jones
2011-12-06 18:39             ` Dave Taht
2011-12-06 19:44               ` John A. Sullivan III
2011-12-07 13:04                 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-12-07 13:27                   ` Dave Taht
2011-12-07 14:08                     ` David Laight
2011-12-08  0:05                       ` John A. Sullivan III
2011-12-07 23:27                         ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-12-08  0:34                           ` John A. Sullivan III
2011-12-07 23:49                             ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-12-08  3:20                               ` John A. Sullivan III

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1323151377.2467.13.camel@edumazet-laptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=jsullivan@opensourcedevel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).