From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "John A. Sullivan III" Subject: Re: Latency guarantees in HFSC rt service curves Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 00:24:51 -0500 Message-ID: <1323840291.8451.174.camel@denise.theartistscloset.com> References: <1323467512.3159.93.camel@denise.theartistscloset.com> <4EE358A4.7060302@ziu.info> <1323531352.3159.106.camel@denise.theartistscloset.com> <4EE39D88.9010002@ziu.info> <1323542103.3159.148.camel@denise.theartistscloset.com> <4EE7E3E4.6070409@ziu.info> <1323839798.8451.172.camel@denise.theartistscloset.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Michal Soltys Return-path: Received: from mout.perfora.net ([74.208.4.194]:65331 "EHLO mout.perfora.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750751Ab1LNFY5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Dec 2011 00:24:57 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1323839798.8451.172.camel@denise.theartistscloset.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 00:16 -0500, John A. Sullivan III wrote: > > > > > If you have a chance, could you look at the email I sent entitled "An > > > error in my HFSC sysadmin documentation". That's the last piece I > > > need to fall in place before I can share my documentation of this > > > week's research. Thanks - John > > > > Yes, will do. > I'm guessing I slightly violated the rt guarantee precisely because of > what I described above. Alas, not. I just reviewed what I sent and it was calculating deadline time with monolinear service curves so I'm still making an error somewhere. Thanks - John