* [PATCH] net: do not pass vlan pkts to real dev pkt handler also @ 2011-12-12 22:19 Vasu Dev 2011-12-12 22:56 ` Jiri Pirko 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Vasu Dev @ 2011-12-12 22:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: netdev; +Cc: jpirko, devel The orig_dev has to be updated before going another round for vlan pkts, otherwise currently unmodified real orig_dev causes vlan pkt delivered to real orig_dev also. The fcoe stack doesn't expects its vlan pkts on real dev and it causes crash in fcoe stack. This wasn't issue untill __netif_receive_skb recursive calling was removed with this commit 0dfe178, so this patch restores orig_dev uses as it was prior to that commit but still w/o recursive calling to __netif_receive_skb. Signed-off-by: Vasu Dev <vasu.dev@intel.com> --- net/core/dev.c | 5 +++-- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c index f494675..adbcd7a 100644 --- a/net/core/dev.c +++ b/net/core/dev.c @@ -3222,9 +3222,10 @@ ncls: ret = deliver_skb(skb, pt_prev, orig_dev); pt_prev = NULL; } - if (vlan_do_receive(&skb, !rx_handler)) + if (vlan_do_receive(&skb, !rx_handler)) { + orig_dev = skb->dev; goto another_round; - else if (unlikely(!skb)) + } else if (unlikely(!skb)) goto out; } ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] net: do not pass vlan pkts to real dev pkt handler also 2011-12-12 22:19 [PATCH] net: do not pass vlan pkts to real dev pkt handler also Vasu Dev @ 2011-12-12 22:56 ` Jiri Pirko 2011-12-13 1:08 ` Vasu Dev 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Jiri Pirko @ 2011-12-12 22:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Vasu Dev; +Cc: netdev, devel, eric.dumazet Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:19:23PM CET, vasu.dev@intel.com wrote: >The orig_dev has to be updated before going another round >for vlan pkts, otherwise currently unmodified real orig_dev >causes vlan pkt delivered to real orig_dev also. > >The fcoe stack doesn't expects its vlan pkts on real dev >and it causes crash in fcoe stack. Could you please provide more info on where exactly it would crash and why? Thanks. Jirka > >This wasn't issue untill __netif_receive_skb recursive calling >was removed with this commit 0dfe178, so this patch restores >orig_dev uses as it was prior to that commit but still w/o >recursive calling to __netif_receive_skb. > >Signed-off-by: Vasu Dev <vasu.dev@intel.com> >--- > > net/core/dev.c | 5 +++-- > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c >index f494675..adbcd7a 100644 >--- a/net/core/dev.c >+++ b/net/core/dev.c >@@ -3222,9 +3222,10 @@ ncls: > ret = deliver_skb(skb, pt_prev, orig_dev); > pt_prev = NULL; > } >- if (vlan_do_receive(&skb, !rx_handler)) >+ if (vlan_do_receive(&skb, !rx_handler)) { >+ orig_dev = skb->dev; > goto another_round; >- else if (unlikely(!skb)) >+ } else if (unlikely(!skb)) > goto out; > } > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] net: do not pass vlan pkts to real dev pkt handler also 2011-12-12 22:56 ` Jiri Pirko @ 2011-12-13 1:08 ` Vasu Dev 2011-12-13 14:21 ` Jiri Pirko 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Vasu Dev @ 2011-12-13 1:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jiri Pirko; +Cc: Vasu Dev, netdev, devel, eric.dumazet On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 23:56 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote: > Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:19:23PM CET, vasu.dev@intel.com wrote: > >The orig_dev has to be updated before going another round > >for vlan pkts, otherwise currently unmodified real orig_dev > >causes vlan pkt delivered to real orig_dev also. > > > >The fcoe stack doesn't expects its vlan pkts on real dev > >and it causes crash in fcoe stack. > > Could you please provide more info on where exactly it would crash and > why? Its in fcoe stack due to its fip rx skb list getting corrupt as same skb instance getting queued twice without being cloned, though list was well protected by its spin lock, it was queued on its two fcoe instances, one on real dev and other on its vlan. I could also handle this gracefully in fcoe stack by cloning but any case netdev should not forward vlan pkt to its read dev pkt handler also and that is getting fixed with this patch, so patch will restore orig_dev uses for *only* vlan pkts as it was with recursive __netif_receive_skb calling prior to commit 0dfe178. Here is the detailed crash log: [ 340.679591] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000008 [ 340.680112] IP: [<ffffffff815088a5>] skb_dequeue+0x55/0x90 [ 340.680112] PGD 0 [ 340.680112] Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP [ 340.680112] CPU 3 [ 340.680112] Modules linked in: fcoe libfcoe libfc scsi_transport_fc 8021q e1000 virtio_balloon ixgbe mdio virtio_blk virtio_pci virtio_ring virtio [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan] [ 340.680112] [ 340.680112] Pid: 442, comm: kworker/3:1 Not tainted 3.2.0-rc4+ #53 Bochs Bochs [ 340.680112] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff815088a5>] [<ffffffff815088a5>] skb_dequeue+0x55/0x90 [ 340.680112] RSP: 0018:ffff88007c963c80 EFLAGS: 00010097 [ 340.680112] RAX: 0000000000000282 RBX: ffff88007baee9b4 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 340.680112] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000286 RDI: ffff88007baee9b4 [ 340.680112] RBP: ffff88007c963ca0 R08: ffff88007c35ddc0 R09: 0000000000000001 [ 340.680112] R10: 0000000000000006 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff88007bedca00 [ 340.680112] R13: ffff88007baee9a0 R14: ffff88007c963d80 R15: ffff88007baeea00 [ 340.680112] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88007fd80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 340.680112] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b [ 340.680112] CR2: 0000000000000008 CR3: 0000000001c05000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 [ 340.680112] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 340.680112] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 340.680112] Process kworker/3:1 (pid: 442, threadinfo ffff88007c962000, task ffff88007c9f60b0) [ 340.680112] Stack: [ 340.680112] ffff88007baee9a0 ffff88007baee8c0 ffff88007baee9a0 ffff88007bedca00 [ 340.680112] ffff88007c963df0 ffffffffa00af7a7 ffff88007baad4d4 ffffffff81060dee [ 340.680112] 0000000000000001 ffff88007c35ddc0 ffff88007c963fd8 0000000000000000 [ 340.680112] Call Trace: [ 340.680112] [<ffffffffa00af7a7>] fcoe_ctlr_recv_work+0x147/0x1870 [libfcoe] [ 340.680112] [<ffffffff81060dee>] ? queue_delayed_work_on+0x9e/0x170 [ 340.680112] [<ffffffffa00af660>] ? fcoe_ctlr_vn_recv+0x9a0/0x9a0 [libfcoe] [ 340.680112] [<ffffffff810612de>] process_one_work+0x11e/0x460 [ 340.680112] [<ffffffff81063af8>] worker_thread+0x178/0x400 [ 340.680112] [<ffffffff81063980>] ? manage_workers+0x210/0x210 [ 340.680112] [<ffffffff81068576>] kthread+0x96/0xa0 [ 340.680112] [<ffffffff81663c74>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10 [ 340.680112] [<ffffffff810684e0>] ? kthread_worker_fn+0x1a0/0x1a0 [ 340.680112] [<ffffffff81663c70>] ? gs_change+0xb/0xb [ 340.680112] Code: 65 00 4d 39 e5 74 4f 4d 85 e4 74 26 41 83 6d 10 01 49 8b 0c 24 49 8b 54 24 08 49 c7 04 24 00 00 00 00 49 c7 44 24 08 00 00 00 00 [ 340.680112] 89 51 08 48 89 0a 48 89 c6 48 89 df e8 39 1b 15 00 4c 89 e0 [ 340.680112] RIP [<ffffffff815088a5>] skb_dequeue+0x55/0x90 [ 340.680112] RSP <ffff88007c963c80> [ 340.680112] CR2: 0000000000000008 Thanks Vasu > > Thanks. > > Jirka > > > > >This wasn't issue untill __netif_receive_skb recursive calling > >was removed with this commit 0dfe178, so this patch restores > >orig_dev uses as it was prior to that commit but still w/o > >recursive calling to __netif_receive_skb. > > > >Signed-off-by: Vasu Dev <vasu.dev@intel.com> > >--- > > > > net/core/dev.c | 5 +++-- > > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > >diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c > >index f494675..adbcd7a 100644 > >--- a/net/core/dev.c > >+++ b/net/core/dev.c > >@@ -3222,9 +3222,10 @@ ncls: > > ret = deliver_skb(skb, pt_prev, orig_dev); > > pt_prev = NULL; > > } > >- if (vlan_do_receive(&skb, !rx_handler)) > >+ if (vlan_do_receive(&skb, !rx_handler)) { > >+ orig_dev = skb->dev; > > goto another_round; > >- else if (unlikely(!skb)) > >+ } else if (unlikely(!skb)) > > goto out; > > } > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] net: do not pass vlan pkts to real dev pkt handler also 2011-12-13 1:08 ` Vasu Dev @ 2011-12-13 14:21 ` Jiri Pirko 2011-12-13 17:11 ` Vasu Dev 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Jiri Pirko @ 2011-12-13 14:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Vasu Dev; +Cc: Vasu Dev, netdev, devel, eric.dumazet Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 02:08:52AM CET, vasu.dev@linux.intel.com wrote: >On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 23:56 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote: >> Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:19:23PM CET, vasu.dev@intel.com wrote: >> >The orig_dev has to be updated before going another round >> >for vlan pkts, otherwise currently unmodified real orig_dev >> >causes vlan pkt delivered to real orig_dev also. >> > >> >The fcoe stack doesn't expects its vlan pkts on real dev >> >and it causes crash in fcoe stack. >> >> Could you please provide more info on where exactly it would crash and >> why? > >Its in fcoe stack due to its fip rx skb list getting corrupt as same skb >instance getting queued twice without being cloned, though list was well >protected by its spin lock, it was queued on its two fcoe instances, one >on real dev and other on its vlan. > >I could also handle this gracefully in fcoe stack by cloning but any >case netdev should not forward vlan pkt to its read dev pkt handler also >and that is getting fixed with this patch, so patch will restore >orig_dev uses for *only* vlan pkts as it was with recursive >__netif_receive_skb calling prior to commit 0dfe178. I do not see into fcoe code, but wouldn't it be good to do skb skb_share_check in fcoe_ctlr_recv? I suppose that would solve your problem and looks legal to me. > >Here is the detailed crash log: > >[ 340.679591] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at >0000000000000008 >[ 340.680112] IP: [<ffffffff815088a5>] skb_dequeue+0x55/0x90 >[ 340.680112] PGD 0 >[ 340.680112] Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP >[ 340.680112] CPU 3 >[ 340.680112] Modules linked in: fcoe libfcoe libfc scsi_transport_fc >8021q e1000 virtio_balloon ixgbe mdio virtio_blk virtio_pci virtio_ring >virtio [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan] >[ 340.680112] >[ 340.680112] Pid: 442, comm: kworker/3:1 Not tainted 3.2.0-rc4+ #53 >Bochs Bochs >[ 340.680112] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff815088a5>] [<ffffffff815088a5>] >skb_dequeue+0x55/0x90 >[ 340.680112] RSP: 0018:ffff88007c963c80 EFLAGS: 00010097 >[ 340.680112] RAX: 0000000000000282 RBX: ffff88007baee9b4 RCX: >0000000000000000 >[ 340.680112] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000286 RDI: >ffff88007baee9b4 >[ 340.680112] RBP: ffff88007c963ca0 R08: ffff88007c35ddc0 R09: >0000000000000001 >[ 340.680112] R10: 0000000000000006 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: >ffff88007bedca00 >[ 340.680112] R13: ffff88007baee9a0 R14: ffff88007c963d80 R15: >ffff88007baeea00 >[ 340.680112] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88007fd80000(0000) >knlGS:0000000000000000 >[ 340.680112] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b >[ 340.680112] CR2: 0000000000000008 CR3: 0000000001c05000 CR4: >00000000000006e0 >[ 340.680112] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: >0000000000000000 >[ 340.680112] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: >0000000000000400 >[ 340.680112] Process kworker/3:1 (pid: 442, threadinfo >ffff88007c962000, task ffff88007c9f60b0) >[ 340.680112] Stack: >[ 340.680112] ffff88007baee9a0 ffff88007baee8c0 ffff88007baee9a0 >ffff88007bedca00 >[ 340.680112] ffff88007c963df0 ffffffffa00af7a7 ffff88007baad4d4 >ffffffff81060dee >[ 340.680112] 0000000000000001 ffff88007c35ddc0 ffff88007c963fd8 >0000000000000000 >[ 340.680112] Call Trace: >[ 340.680112] [<ffffffffa00af7a7>] fcoe_ctlr_recv_work+0x147/0x1870 >[libfcoe] >[ 340.680112] [<ffffffff81060dee>] ? queue_delayed_work_on+0x9e/0x170 >[ 340.680112] [<ffffffffa00af660>] ? fcoe_ctlr_vn_recv+0x9a0/0x9a0 >[libfcoe] >[ 340.680112] [<ffffffff810612de>] process_one_work+0x11e/0x460 >[ 340.680112] [<ffffffff81063af8>] worker_thread+0x178/0x400 >[ 340.680112] [<ffffffff81063980>] ? manage_workers+0x210/0x210 >[ 340.680112] [<ffffffff81068576>] kthread+0x96/0xa0 >[ 340.680112] [<ffffffff81663c74>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10 >[ 340.680112] [<ffffffff810684e0>] ? kthread_worker_fn+0x1a0/0x1a0 >[ 340.680112] [<ffffffff81663c70>] ? gs_change+0xb/0xb >[ 340.680112] Code: 65 00 4d 39 e5 74 4f 4d 85 e4 74 26 41 83 6d 10 01 >49 8b 0c 24 49 8b 54 24 08 49 c7 04 24 00 00 00 00 49 c7 44 24 08 00 00 >00 00 >[ 340.680112] 89 51 08 48 89 0a 48 89 c6 48 89 df e8 39 1b 15 00 4c 89 >e0 >[ 340.680112] RIP [<ffffffff815088a5>] skb_dequeue+0x55/0x90 >[ 340.680112] RSP <ffff88007c963c80> >[ 340.680112] CR2: 0000000000000008 > > > >Thanks >Vasu > >> >> Thanks. >> >> Jirka >> >> > >> >This wasn't issue untill __netif_receive_skb recursive calling >> >was removed with this commit 0dfe178, so this patch restores >> >orig_dev uses as it was prior to that commit but still w/o >> >recursive calling to __netif_receive_skb. >> > >> >Signed-off-by: Vasu Dev <vasu.dev@intel.com> >> >--- >> > >> > net/core/dev.c | 5 +++-- >> > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> > >> >diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c >> >index f494675..adbcd7a 100644 >> >--- a/net/core/dev.c >> >+++ b/net/core/dev.c >> >@@ -3222,9 +3222,10 @@ ncls: >> > ret = deliver_skb(skb, pt_prev, orig_dev); >> > pt_prev = NULL; >> > } >> >- if (vlan_do_receive(&skb, !rx_handler)) >> >+ if (vlan_do_receive(&skb, !rx_handler)) { >> >+ orig_dev = skb->dev; >> > goto another_round; >> >- else if (unlikely(!skb)) >> >+ } else if (unlikely(!skb)) >> > goto out; >> > } >> > >> > >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] net: do not pass vlan pkts to real dev pkt handler also 2011-12-13 14:21 ` Jiri Pirko @ 2011-12-13 17:11 ` Vasu Dev 2011-12-13 21:45 ` Jiri Pirko 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Vasu Dev @ 2011-12-13 17:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jiri Pirko; +Cc: Vasu Dev, netdev, devel, eric.dumazet On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 15:21 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote: > Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 02:08:52AM CET, vasu.dev@linux.intel.com wrote: > >On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 23:56 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote: > >> Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:19:23PM CET, vasu.dev@intel.com wrote: > >> >The orig_dev has to be updated before going another round > >> >for vlan pkts, otherwise currently unmodified real orig_dev > >> >causes vlan pkt delivered to real orig_dev also. > >> > > >> >The fcoe stack doesn't expects its vlan pkts on real dev > >> >and it causes crash in fcoe stack. > >> > >> Could you please provide more info on where exactly it would crash and > >> why? > > > >Its in fcoe stack due to its fip rx skb list getting corrupt as same skb > >instance getting queued twice without being cloned, though list was well > >protected by its spin lock, it was queued on its two fcoe instances, one > >on real dev and other on its vlan. > > > >I could also handle this gracefully in fcoe stack by cloning but any > >case netdev should not forward vlan pkt to its read dev pkt handler also > >and that is getting fixed with this patch, so patch will restore > >orig_dev uses for *only* vlan pkts as it was with recursive > >__netif_receive_skb calling prior to commit 0dfe178. > > > I do not see into fcoe code, but wouldn't it be good to do skb > skb_share_check in fcoe_ctlr_recv? I suppose that would solve your > problem and looks legal to me. > Yes that will fix along with dropping vlan pkts on real dev, so some additional checking for dropping also. In fact that is what I meant in my last response by "I could also handle this gracefully in fcoe stack by cloning" as skb_share_check() does that conditionally. But as far as this patch goes, are you okay with the fix to not forward vlan pkt on real dev pkt handler ? I think this is required regardless of fcoe stack fixing for shared skb since otherwise all upper layers of real dev pkt handler has to handle with un-expected vlan pkts also. Thanks for your review. Vasu > > > > >Here is the detailed crash log: > > > >[ 340.679591] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at > >0000000000000008 > >[ 340.680112] IP: [<ffffffff815088a5>] skb_dequeue+0x55/0x90 > >[ 340.680112] PGD 0 > >[ 340.680112] Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP > >[ 340.680112] CPU 3 > >[ 340.680112] Modules linked in: fcoe libfcoe libfc scsi_transport_fc > >8021q e1000 virtio_balloon ixgbe mdio virtio_blk virtio_pci virtio_ring > >virtio [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan] > >[ 340.680112] > >[ 340.680112] Pid: 442, comm: kworker/3:1 Not tainted 3.2.0-rc4+ #53 > >Bochs Bochs > >[ 340.680112] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff815088a5>] [<ffffffff815088a5>] > >skb_dequeue+0x55/0x90 > >[ 340.680112] RSP: 0018:ffff88007c963c80 EFLAGS: 00010097 > >[ 340.680112] RAX: 0000000000000282 RBX: ffff88007baee9b4 RCX: > >0000000000000000 > >[ 340.680112] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000286 RDI: > >ffff88007baee9b4 > >[ 340.680112] RBP: ffff88007c963ca0 R08: ffff88007c35ddc0 R09: > >0000000000000001 > >[ 340.680112] R10: 0000000000000006 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: > >ffff88007bedca00 > >[ 340.680112] R13: ffff88007baee9a0 R14: ffff88007c963d80 R15: > >ffff88007baeea00 > >[ 340.680112] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88007fd80000(0000) > >knlGS:0000000000000000 > >[ 340.680112] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b > >[ 340.680112] CR2: 0000000000000008 CR3: 0000000001c05000 CR4: > >00000000000006e0 > >[ 340.680112] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: > >0000000000000000 > >[ 340.680112] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: > >0000000000000400 > >[ 340.680112] Process kworker/3:1 (pid: 442, threadinfo > >ffff88007c962000, task ffff88007c9f60b0) > >[ 340.680112] Stack: > >[ 340.680112] ffff88007baee9a0 ffff88007baee8c0 ffff88007baee9a0 > >ffff88007bedca00 > >[ 340.680112] ffff88007c963df0 ffffffffa00af7a7 ffff88007baad4d4 > >ffffffff81060dee > >[ 340.680112] 0000000000000001 ffff88007c35ddc0 ffff88007c963fd8 > >0000000000000000 > >[ 340.680112] Call Trace: > >[ 340.680112] [<ffffffffa00af7a7>] fcoe_ctlr_recv_work+0x147/0x1870 > >[libfcoe] > >[ 340.680112] [<ffffffff81060dee>] ? queue_delayed_work_on+0x9e/0x170 > >[ 340.680112] [<ffffffffa00af660>] ? fcoe_ctlr_vn_recv+0x9a0/0x9a0 > >[libfcoe] > >[ 340.680112] [<ffffffff810612de>] process_one_work+0x11e/0x460 > >[ 340.680112] [<ffffffff81063af8>] worker_thread+0x178/0x400 > >[ 340.680112] [<ffffffff81063980>] ? manage_workers+0x210/0x210 > >[ 340.680112] [<ffffffff81068576>] kthread+0x96/0xa0 > >[ 340.680112] [<ffffffff81663c74>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10 > >[ 340.680112] [<ffffffff810684e0>] ? kthread_worker_fn+0x1a0/0x1a0 > >[ 340.680112] [<ffffffff81663c70>] ? gs_change+0xb/0xb > >[ 340.680112] Code: 65 00 4d 39 e5 74 4f 4d 85 e4 74 26 41 83 6d 10 01 > >49 8b 0c 24 49 8b 54 24 08 49 c7 04 24 00 00 00 00 49 c7 44 24 08 00 00 > >00 00 > >[ 340.680112] 89 51 08 48 89 0a 48 89 c6 48 89 df e8 39 1b 15 00 4c 89 > >e0 > >[ 340.680112] RIP [<ffffffff815088a5>] skb_dequeue+0x55/0x90 > >[ 340.680112] RSP <ffff88007c963c80> > >[ 340.680112] CR2: 0000000000000008 > > > > > > > >Thanks > >Vasu > > > >> > >> Thanks. > >> > >> Jirka > >> > >> > > >> >This wasn't issue untill __netif_receive_skb recursive calling > >> >was removed with this commit 0dfe178, so this patch restores > >> >orig_dev uses as it was prior to that commit but still w/o > >> >recursive calling to __netif_receive_skb. > >> > > >> >Signed-off-by: Vasu Dev <vasu.dev@intel.com> > >> >--- > >> > > >> > net/core/dev.c | 5 +++-- > >> > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >> > > >> >diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c > >> >index f494675..adbcd7a 100644 > >> >--- a/net/core/dev.c > >> >+++ b/net/core/dev.c > >> >@@ -3222,9 +3222,10 @@ ncls: > >> > ret = deliver_skb(skb, pt_prev, orig_dev); > >> > pt_prev = NULL; > >> > } > >> >- if (vlan_do_receive(&skb, !rx_handler)) > >> >+ if (vlan_do_receive(&skb, !rx_handler)) { > >> >+ orig_dev = skb->dev; > >> > goto another_round; > >> >- else if (unlikely(!skb)) > >> >+ } else if (unlikely(!skb)) > >> > goto out; > >> > } > >> > > >> > > >> -- > >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in > >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] net: do not pass vlan pkts to real dev pkt handler also 2011-12-13 17:11 ` Vasu Dev @ 2011-12-13 21:45 ` Jiri Pirko 2011-12-14 19:52 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Jiri Pirko @ 2011-12-13 21:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Vasu Dev; +Cc: Vasu Dev, netdev, devel, eric.dumazet Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 06:11:03PM CET, vasu.dev@linux.intel.com wrote: >On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 15:21 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote: >> Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 02:08:52AM CET, vasu.dev@linux.intel.com wrote: >> >On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 23:56 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote: >> >> Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:19:23PM CET, vasu.dev@intel.com wrote: >> >> >The orig_dev has to be updated before going another round >> >> >for vlan pkts, otherwise currently unmodified real orig_dev >> >> >causes vlan pkt delivered to real orig_dev also. >> >> > >> >> >The fcoe stack doesn't expects its vlan pkts on real dev >> >> >and it causes crash in fcoe stack. >> >> >> >> Could you please provide more info on where exactly it would crash and >> >> why? >> > >> >Its in fcoe stack due to its fip rx skb list getting corrupt as same skb >> >instance getting queued twice without being cloned, though list was well >> >protected by its spin lock, it was queued on its two fcoe instances, one >> >on real dev and other on its vlan. >> > >> >I could also handle this gracefully in fcoe stack by cloning but any >> >case netdev should not forward vlan pkt to its read dev pkt handler also >> >and that is getting fixed with this patch, so patch will restore >> >orig_dev uses for *only* vlan pkts as it was with recursive >> >__netif_receive_skb calling prior to commit 0dfe178. >> >> >> I do not see into fcoe code, but wouldn't it be good to do skb >> skb_share_check in fcoe_ctlr_recv? I suppose that would solve your >> problem and looks legal to me. >> > >Yes that will fix along with dropping vlan pkts on real dev, so some >additional checking for dropping also. In fact that is what I meant in >my last response by "I could also handle this gracefully in fcoe stack >by cloning" as skb_share_check() does that conditionally. > >But as far as this patch goes, are you okay with the fix to not forward >vlan pkt on real dev pkt handler ? I think this is required regardless >of fcoe stack fixing for shared skb since otherwise all upper layers of >real dev pkt handler has to handle with un-expected vlan pkts also. I think that's what orig_dev is destined for. To provide a possiblility to do this. I would like to leave that as it is. > >Thanks for your review. >Vasu > > >> >> > >> >Here is the detailed crash log: >> > >> >[ 340.679591] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at >> >0000000000000008 >> >[ 340.680112] IP: [<ffffffff815088a5>] skb_dequeue+0x55/0x90 >> >[ 340.680112] PGD 0 >> >[ 340.680112] Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP >> >[ 340.680112] CPU 3 >> >[ 340.680112] Modules linked in: fcoe libfcoe libfc scsi_transport_fc >> >8021q e1000 virtio_balloon ixgbe mdio virtio_blk virtio_pci virtio_ring >> >virtio [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan] >> >[ 340.680112] >> >[ 340.680112] Pid: 442, comm: kworker/3:1 Not tainted 3.2.0-rc4+ #53 >> >Bochs Bochs >> >[ 340.680112] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff815088a5>] [<ffffffff815088a5>] >> >skb_dequeue+0x55/0x90 >> >[ 340.680112] RSP: 0018:ffff88007c963c80 EFLAGS: 00010097 >> >[ 340.680112] RAX: 0000000000000282 RBX: ffff88007baee9b4 RCX: >> >0000000000000000 >> >[ 340.680112] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000286 RDI: >> >ffff88007baee9b4 >> >[ 340.680112] RBP: ffff88007c963ca0 R08: ffff88007c35ddc0 R09: >> >0000000000000001 >> >[ 340.680112] R10: 0000000000000006 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: >> >ffff88007bedca00 >> >[ 340.680112] R13: ffff88007baee9a0 R14: ffff88007c963d80 R15: >> >ffff88007baeea00 >> >[ 340.680112] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88007fd80000(0000) >> >knlGS:0000000000000000 >> >[ 340.680112] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b >> >[ 340.680112] CR2: 0000000000000008 CR3: 0000000001c05000 CR4: >> >00000000000006e0 >> >[ 340.680112] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: >> >0000000000000000 >> >[ 340.680112] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: >> >0000000000000400 >> >[ 340.680112] Process kworker/3:1 (pid: 442, threadinfo >> >ffff88007c962000, task ffff88007c9f60b0) >> >[ 340.680112] Stack: >> >[ 340.680112] ffff88007baee9a0 ffff88007baee8c0 ffff88007baee9a0 >> >ffff88007bedca00 >> >[ 340.680112] ffff88007c963df0 ffffffffa00af7a7 ffff88007baad4d4 >> >ffffffff81060dee >> >[ 340.680112] 0000000000000001 ffff88007c35ddc0 ffff88007c963fd8 >> >0000000000000000 >> >[ 340.680112] Call Trace: >> >[ 340.680112] [<ffffffffa00af7a7>] fcoe_ctlr_recv_work+0x147/0x1870 >> >[libfcoe] >> >[ 340.680112] [<ffffffff81060dee>] ? queue_delayed_work_on+0x9e/0x170 >> >[ 340.680112] [<ffffffffa00af660>] ? fcoe_ctlr_vn_recv+0x9a0/0x9a0 >> >[libfcoe] >> >[ 340.680112] [<ffffffff810612de>] process_one_work+0x11e/0x460 >> >[ 340.680112] [<ffffffff81063af8>] worker_thread+0x178/0x400 >> >[ 340.680112] [<ffffffff81063980>] ? manage_workers+0x210/0x210 >> >[ 340.680112] [<ffffffff81068576>] kthread+0x96/0xa0 >> >[ 340.680112] [<ffffffff81663c74>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10 >> >[ 340.680112] [<ffffffff810684e0>] ? kthread_worker_fn+0x1a0/0x1a0 >> >[ 340.680112] [<ffffffff81663c70>] ? gs_change+0xb/0xb >> >[ 340.680112] Code: 65 00 4d 39 e5 74 4f 4d 85 e4 74 26 41 83 6d 10 01 >> >49 8b 0c 24 49 8b 54 24 08 49 c7 04 24 00 00 00 00 49 c7 44 24 08 00 00 >> >00 00 >> >[ 340.680112] 89 51 08 48 89 0a 48 89 c6 48 89 df e8 39 1b 15 00 4c 89 >> >e0 >> >[ 340.680112] RIP [<ffffffff815088a5>] skb_dequeue+0x55/0x90 >> >[ 340.680112] RSP <ffff88007c963c80> >> >[ 340.680112] CR2: 0000000000000008 >> > >> > >> > >> >Thanks >> >Vasu >> > >> >> >> >> Thanks. >> >> >> >> Jirka >> >> >> >> > >> >> >This wasn't issue untill __netif_receive_skb recursive calling >> >> >was removed with this commit 0dfe178, so this patch restores >> >> >orig_dev uses as it was prior to that commit but still w/o >> >> >recursive calling to __netif_receive_skb. >> >> > >> >> >Signed-off-by: Vasu Dev <vasu.dev@intel.com> >> >> >--- >> >> > >> >> > net/core/dev.c | 5 +++-- >> >> > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> > >> >> >diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c >> >> >index f494675..adbcd7a 100644 >> >> >--- a/net/core/dev.c >> >> >+++ b/net/core/dev.c >> >> >@@ -3222,9 +3222,10 @@ ncls: >> >> > ret = deliver_skb(skb, pt_prev, orig_dev); >> >> > pt_prev = NULL; >> >> > } >> >> >- if (vlan_do_receive(&skb, !rx_handler)) >> >> >+ if (vlan_do_receive(&skb, !rx_handler)) { >> >> >+ orig_dev = skb->dev; >> >> > goto another_round; >> >> >- else if (unlikely(!skb)) >> >> >+ } else if (unlikely(!skb)) >> >> > goto out; >> >> > } >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -- >> >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in >> >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> > >> > >> > >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] net: do not pass vlan pkts to real dev pkt handler also 2011-12-13 21:45 ` Jiri Pirko @ 2011-12-14 19:52 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan 2011-12-14 23:55 ` Vasu Dev 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Nicolas de Pesloüan @ 2011-12-14 19:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jiri Pirko; +Cc: Vasu Dev, Vasu Dev, netdev, devel, eric.dumazet Le 13/12/2011 22:45, Jiri Pirko a écrit : > Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 06:11:03PM CET, vasu.dev@linux.intel.com wrote: >> On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 15:21 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote: >>> Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 02:08:52AM CET, vasu.dev@linux.intel.com wrote: >>>> On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 23:56 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote: >>>>> Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:19:23PM CET, vasu.dev@intel.com wrote: >>>>>> The orig_dev has to be updated before going another round >>>>>> for vlan pkts, otherwise currently unmodified real orig_dev >>>>>> causes vlan pkt delivered to real orig_dev also. >>>>>> >>>>>> The fcoe stack doesn't expects its vlan pkts on real dev >>>>>> and it causes crash in fcoe stack. >>>>> >>>>> Could you please provide more info on where exactly it would crash and >>>>> why? >>>> >>>> Its in fcoe stack due to its fip rx skb list getting corrupt as same skb >>>> instance getting queued twice without being cloned, though list was well >>>> protected by its spin lock, it was queued on its two fcoe instances, one >>>> on real dev and other on its vlan. >>>> >>>> I could also handle this gracefully in fcoe stack by cloning but any >>>> case netdev should not forward vlan pkt to its read dev pkt handler also >>>> and that is getting fixed with this patch, so patch will restore >>>> orig_dev uses for *only* vlan pkts as it was with recursive >>>> __netif_receive_skb calling prior to commit 0dfe178. >>> >>> >>> I do not see into fcoe code, but wouldn't it be good to do skb >>> skb_share_check in fcoe_ctlr_recv? I suppose that would solve your >>> problem and looks legal to me. >>> >> >> Yes that will fix along with dropping vlan pkts on real dev, so some >> additional checking for dropping also. In fact that is what I meant in >> my last response by "I could also handle this gracefully in fcoe stack >> by cloning" as skb_share_check() does that conditionally. >> >> But as far as this patch goes, are you okay with the fix to not forward >> vlan pkt on real dev pkt handler ? I think this is required regardless >> of fcoe stack fixing for shared skb since otherwise all upper layers of >> real dev pkt handler has to handle with un-expected vlan pkts also. > > I think that's what orig_dev is destined for. To provide a possiblility > to do this. I would like to leave that as it is. I agree with Jiri. If a protocol handler is registered on a particular device (instead of NULL), then the handler will receive whatever is received on this device. This is true for bridge, for bonding and probably for all other "stackable" devices. I don't see any reason to handle it in a different way for vlan. Nicolas. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] net: do not pass vlan pkts to real dev pkt handler also 2011-12-14 19:52 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan @ 2011-12-14 23:55 ` Vasu Dev 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Vasu Dev @ 2011-12-14 23:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Nicolas de Pesloüan Cc: Jiri Pirko, Vasu Dev, netdev, devel, eric.dumazet On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 20:52 +0100, Nicolas de Pesloüan wrote: > If a protocol handler is registered on a particular device (instead of > NULL), then the handler will > receive whatever is received on this device. This is true for bridge, > for bonding and probably for > all other "stackable" devices. I don't see any reason to handle it in > a different way for vlan. > Yeah okay to have orig_dev pkt handler see its all vlan frames though we didn't have that way until recent change but seems reasonable to have this way now. So I'll fix fcoe by allowing frames matching to its own device and that will exclude vlan frames on its orig_dev pkt handler. However now each stacked vlan tag iteration would result in passing up frame to its orig_dev pkt handler but don't know if that affects other and anyway fcoe would be okay with that as well. Thanks Vasu ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-12-15 0:42 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2011-12-12 22:19 [PATCH] net: do not pass vlan pkts to real dev pkt handler also Vasu Dev 2011-12-12 22:56 ` Jiri Pirko 2011-12-13 1:08 ` Vasu Dev 2011-12-13 14:21 ` Jiri Pirko 2011-12-13 17:11 ` Vasu Dev 2011-12-13 21:45 ` Jiri Pirko 2011-12-14 19:52 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan 2011-12-14 23:55 ` Vasu Dev
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).