Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Vijay Subramanian <subramanian.vijay@gmail.com>
Cc: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>,
	tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: twice past the taps, thence out to net?
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 18:43:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1323970998.2769.18.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGK4HS-+jj9cvvirDm96oRvRJdwC+2kjE_LnSOXBuQy0pfnQjg@mail.gmail.com>

Le mercredi 14 décembre 2011 à 18:12 -0800, Vijay Subramanian a écrit :
> On 14 December 2011 11:27, Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com> wrote:
> > While looking at "something else" with tcpdump/tcptrace, tcptrace emitted
> > lots of notices about hardware duplicated packets being detected (same TCP
> > sequence number and IP datagram ID).  Sure enough, if I go into the tcpdump
> > trace (taken on the sender) I can find instances of what it was talking
> > about, separated in time by rather less than I would expect to be the RTO,
> > and often as not with few if any intervening arriving ACKs to trigger
> > anything like fast retransmit.  And besides, those would have a different IP
> > datagram ID no?
> >
> > I did manage to reproduce the issue with plain netperf tcp_stream tests. I
> > had one sending system with 30 concurrent netperf tcp_stream tests to 30
> > other receiving systems.  There are "hardware duplicates" in the sending
> > trace, but no duplicate segments (that I can find thus far) in the two
> > receiver side traces I took.  Of course that doesn't mean "conclusively"
> > there were two actual sends but it suggests there werent.
> >
> > While I work through the "obtain permission" path to post the packet traces
> > (don't ask...) I thought I would ask if anyone else has seen something
> > similar.
> >
> > In this case, all the systems are running a 2.6.38-8 Ubuntu kernel (the same
> > sorts of issues which delay my just putting the traces up on netperf.org
> > preclude a later kernel, and I've no other test systems :( ), with Intel
> > 82576 interfaces being driven by:
> >
> > $ sudo ethtool -i eth0
> > driver: igb
> > version: 2.1.0-k2
> > firmware-version: 1.8-2
> > bus-info: 0000:05:00.0
> >
> > All the systems were connected to the same switch.
> >
> 
> Rick,
> This may be of help.
> http://www.tcptrace.org/faq_ans.html#FAQ%2021

More exactly, we call dev_queue_xmit_nit() from dev_hard_start_xmit()
_before_ giving skb to device driver.

If device driver returns NETDEV_TX_BUSY, and a qdisc was setup on the
device, packet is requeued.

Later, when queue is allowed to send again packets, packet is
retransmitted (and traced a second time in dev_queue_xmit_nit())

You can see the 'requeues' counter from "tc -s -d qdisc" output :

qdisc mq 0: dev eth2 root 
 Sent 29421597369 bytes 20301716 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 371) 
 backlog 0b 0p requeues 371 

  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-15 17:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-14 19:27 twice past the taps, thence out to net? Rick Jones
2011-12-15  0:58 ` Benjamin Poirier
2011-12-15  2:12 ` Vijay Subramanian
2011-12-15 17:43   ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2011-12-15 18:32     ` Rick Jones
2011-12-15 18:44       ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-12-15 19:00         ` Eric Dumazet
2011-12-15 22:22           ` Rick Jones
2011-12-16  4:27             ` Eric Dumazet
2011-12-16 18:28               ` Jesse Brandeburg
2011-12-16 19:34                 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-12-16 19:35               ` Rick Jones
2011-12-16 19:44                 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-12-20 21:21                   ` Wyborny, Carolyn
2011-12-15 18:54       ` Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1323970998.2769.18.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rick.jones2@hp.com \
    --cc=subramanian.vijay@gmail.com \
    --cc=tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox