From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Hutchings Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] bna: Added flash sub-module and ethtool eeprom entry points. Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 09:44:22 +0000 Message-ID: <1324633462.3860.6.camel@deadeye> References: <1324596585-8614-1-git-send-email-kgudipat@brocade.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: , , , To: Return-path: Received: from mail.solarflare.com ([216.237.3.220]:58480 "EHLO ocex02.SolarFlarecom.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751664Ab1LWJom (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Dec 2011 04:44:42 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1324596585-8614-1-git-send-email-kgudipat@brocade.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 15:29 -0800, kgudipat@brocade.com wrote: > From: Krishna Gudipati > > Change details: > - The patch adds flash sub-module to the bna driver. > - Added ethtool set_eeprom() and get_eeprom() entry points to > support flash partition read/write operations. [...] I'm not going to say this is wrong, but we didn't find the EEPROM operations suitable for firmware upgrade. I have a couple of questions: 1. How long can a single set_eeprom() operation take? 2. Have you considered implementing the flash_device() operation or an MTD driver? Ben. -- Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.