[PATCHv2 net-next 3/8] sfc: Change filter ID generation to satisfy priority semantics of RX NFC

Ben Hutchings
2012-01-03T22:05:19Z

Also add note that the efx_filter_spec::priority field has nothing
to do with priority between multiple matching filters.

Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/filter.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/filter.h | 5 ++++
2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/filter.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/filter.c
index 2b9636f..1e079bd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/filter.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/filter.c
@@ -366,12 +366,45 @@ static int efx_filter_search(struct efx_filter_table *table,
}
}

-/* Construct/deconstruct external filter IDs */
+/*
+ * Construct/deconstruct external filter IDs. These must be ordered
+ * by matching priority, for RX NFC semantics.
+ *
+ * Each RX MAC filter entry has a flag for whether it can override an
+ * RX IP filter that also matches. So we assign locations for MAC
+ * filters with overriding behaviour, then for IP filters, then for
+ * MAC filters without overriding behaviour.
+ */
+
+#define EFX_FILTER_INDEX_WIDTH 13
+#define EFX_FILTER_INDEX_MASK ((1 << EFX_FILTER_INDEX_WIDTH) - 1)
+
+static inline u32 efx_filter_make_id(enum efx_filter_table_id table_id,
+ unsigned int index, u8 flags)
+{
+ return (table_id == EFX_FILTER_TABLE_RX_MAC &&
+ flags & EFX_FILTER_FLAG_RX_OVERRIDE_IP) ?
+ index :
+ (table_id + 1) << EFX_FILTER_INDEX_WIDTH | index;
+}
+
+static inline enum efx_filter_table_id efx_filter_id_table_id(u32 id)
+{
+ return (id <= EFX_FILTER_INDEX_MASK) ?
+ EFX_FILTER_TABLE_RX_MAC :
+ (id >> EFX_FILTER_INDEX_WIDTH) - 1;
+}
+
+static inline unsigned int efx_filter_id_index(u32 id)
+{
+ return id & EFX_FILTER_INDEX_MASK;
+}

-static inline int
-efx_filter_make_id(enum efx_filter_table_id table_id, unsigned index)
+static inline u8 efx_filter_id_flags(u32 id)
{
- return table_id << 16 | index;
+ return (id <= EFX_FILTER_INDEX_MASK) ?
+ EFX_FILTER_FLAG_RX | EFX_FILTER_FLAG_RX_OVERRIDE_IP :
+ EFX_FILTER_FLAG_RX;
}

/**
@@ -439,7 +472,7 @@ int efx_filter_insert_filter(struct efx_nic *efx, struct efx_filter_spec *spec,
netif_vdbg(efx, hw, efx->net_dev,
"%s: filter type %d index %d rxq %u set",
__func__, spec->type, filter_idx, spec->dmaq_id);
- rc = efx_filter_make_id(table->id, filter_idx);
+ rc = efx_filter_make_id(table->id, filter_idx, spec->flags);

out:
spin_unlock_bh(&state->lock);
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/filter.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/filter.h
index 872f213..dc9a256 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/filter.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/filter.h
@@ -78,6 +78,11 @@ enum efx_filter_flags {
*
* Use the efx_filter_set_*() functions to initialise the @type and
* @data fields.
+ *
+ * The @priority field is used by software to determine whether a new
+ * filter may replace an old one. The hardware priority of a filter
+ * depends on the filter type and %EFX_FILTER_FLAG_RX_OVERRIDE_IP
+ * flag.
*/
struct efx_filter_spec {
u8 type:4;