From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com>
Subject: [PATCHv2 net-next 3/8] sfc: Change filter ID generation to satisfy priority semantics of RX NFC
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 22:05:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1325628315.2832.39.camel@bwh-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1325627819.2832.31.camel@bwh-desktop>
Also add note that the efx_filter_spec::priority field has nothing
to do with priority between multiple matching filters.
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/filter.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/filter.h | 5 ++++
2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/filter.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/filter.c
index 2b9636f..1e079bd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/filter.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/filter.c
@@ -366,12 +366,45 @@ static int efx_filter_search(struct efx_filter_table *table,
}
}
-/* Construct/deconstruct external filter IDs */
+/*
+ * Construct/deconstruct external filter IDs. These must be ordered
+ * by matching priority, for RX NFC semantics.
+ *
+ * Each RX MAC filter entry has a flag for whether it can override an
+ * RX IP filter that also matches. So we assign locations for MAC
+ * filters with overriding behaviour, then for IP filters, then for
+ * MAC filters without overriding behaviour.
+ */
+
+#define EFX_FILTER_INDEX_WIDTH 13
+#define EFX_FILTER_INDEX_MASK ((1 << EFX_FILTER_INDEX_WIDTH) - 1)
+
+static inline u32 efx_filter_make_id(enum efx_filter_table_id table_id,
+ unsigned int index, u8 flags)
+{
+ return (table_id == EFX_FILTER_TABLE_RX_MAC &&
+ flags & EFX_FILTER_FLAG_RX_OVERRIDE_IP) ?
+ index :
+ (table_id + 1) << EFX_FILTER_INDEX_WIDTH | index;
+}
+
+static inline enum efx_filter_table_id efx_filter_id_table_id(u32 id)
+{
+ return (id <= EFX_FILTER_INDEX_MASK) ?
+ EFX_FILTER_TABLE_RX_MAC :
+ (id >> EFX_FILTER_INDEX_WIDTH) - 1;
+}
+
+static inline unsigned int efx_filter_id_index(u32 id)
+{
+ return id & EFX_FILTER_INDEX_MASK;
+}
-static inline int
-efx_filter_make_id(enum efx_filter_table_id table_id, unsigned index)
+static inline u8 efx_filter_id_flags(u32 id)
{
- return table_id << 16 | index;
+ return (id <= EFX_FILTER_INDEX_MASK) ?
+ EFX_FILTER_FLAG_RX | EFX_FILTER_FLAG_RX_OVERRIDE_IP :
+ EFX_FILTER_FLAG_RX;
}
/**
@@ -439,7 +472,7 @@ int efx_filter_insert_filter(struct efx_nic *efx, struct efx_filter_spec *spec,
netif_vdbg(efx, hw, efx->net_dev,
"%s: filter type %d index %d rxq %u set",
__func__, spec->type, filter_idx, spec->dmaq_id);
- rc = efx_filter_make_id(table->id, filter_idx);
+ rc = efx_filter_make_id(table->id, filter_idx, spec->flags);
out:
spin_unlock_bh(&state->lock);
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/filter.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/filter.h
index 872f213..dc9a256 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/filter.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/filter.h
@@ -78,6 +78,11 @@ enum efx_filter_flags {
*
* Use the efx_filter_set_*() functions to initialise the @type and
* @data fields.
+ *
+ * The @priority field is used by software to determine whether a new
+ * filter may replace an old one. The hardware priority of a filter
+ * depends on the filter type and %EFX_FILTER_FLAG_RX_OVERRIDE_IP
+ * flag.
*/
struct efx_filter_spec {
u8 type:4;
--
1.7.4.4
--
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-03 22:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-03 21:56 [PATCHv2 net-next 0/8] RX NFC support for hash-based filters Ben Hutchings
2012-01-03 21:59 ` [PATCHv2 net-next 1/8] gianfar: Reject out-of-range RX NFC locations Ben Hutchings
2012-01-03 22:04 ` [PATCHv2 net-next 2/8] ethtool: Allow drivers to select RX NFC rule locations Ben Hutchings
2012-01-03 22:05 ` Ben Hutchings [this message]
2012-01-03 22:05 ` [PATCHv2 net-next 4/8] sfc: Use consistent types for filter IDs, indices and search depths Ben Hutchings
2012-01-03 22:05 ` [PATCHv2 net-next 5/8] sfc: Add support for retrieving and removing filters by ID Ben Hutchings
2012-01-03 22:05 ` [PATCHv2 net-next 6/8] sfc: Implement ethtool RX NFC rules API instead of n-tuple API Ben Hutchings
2012-01-03 22:05 ` [PATCHv2 net-next 7/8] sfc: Remove now-unused filter function Ben Hutchings
2012-01-03 22:07 ` [PATCHv2 net-next 8/8] ethtool: Remove ethtool_ops::set_rx_ntuple operation Ben Hutchings
2012-01-03 22:24 ` [PATCHv2 ethtool 1/3] ethtool-copy.h: sync with net-next Ben Hutchings
2012-01-03 22:24 ` [PATCHv2 ethtool 2/3] rxclass: Use RX_CLS_LOC_{ANY,SPECIAL} in place of RX_CLS_LOC_UNSPEC Ben Hutchings
2012-01-03 22:25 ` [PATCHv2 ethtool 3/3] rxclass: Allow driver to select RX NFC rule location Ben Hutchings
2012-01-04 19:11 ` [PATCHv2 net-next 0/8] RX NFC support for hash-based filters David Miller
2012-01-04 21:39 ` Ben Hutchings
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1325628315.2832.39.camel@bwh-desktop \
--to=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox