From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: "Allan, Bruce W" <bruce.w.allan@intel.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"gospo@redhat.com" <gospo@redhat.com>,
"sassmann@redhat.com" <sassmann@redhat.com>
Subject: RE: [net-next 08/11] e1000e: add Receive Packet Steering (RPS) support
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 16:12:54 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1325635974.24257.20.camel@joe2Laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <804857E1F29AAC47BF68C404FC60A18402A7BC@ORSMSX102.amr.corp.intel.com>
On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 20:28 +0000, Allan, Bruce W wrote:
> >From: David Miller [mailto:davem@davemloft.net]
> >Fair enough, I rescind my request and this patch is fine as-is.
> Okay, thanks Dave.
A couple of other comments though.
On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 11:19 -0800, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> From: Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@intel.com>
>
> Enable RPS by default. Disallow jumbo frames when both receive checksum
> and receive hashing are enabled because the hardware cannot do both IP
> payload checksum (enabled when receive checksum is enabled when using
> packet split which is used for jumbo frames) and provide RSS hash at the
> same time.
[]
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
[]
> +static void e1000e_setup_rss_hash(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
[]
> + static const u8 rsshash[40] = {
[]
+ };
> +
> + /* Fill out hash function seeds */
> + for (j = 0; j < 10; j++) {
> + u32 rsskey = rsshash[(j * 4)];
> + rsskey |= rsshash[(j * 4) + 1] << 8;
> + rsskey |= rsshash[(j * 4) + 2] << 16;
> + rsskey |= rsshash[(j * 4) + 3] << 24;
Strictly, don't these shifts first need a cast to u32?
u32 rsskey = rsshash[j * 4];
rsskey |= ((u32)rsshash[j * 4 + 1]) << 8;
rsskey |= ((u32)rsshash[j * 4 + 2]) << 16;
rsskey |= ((u32)rsshash[j * 4 + 3]) << 24;
[]
> + if (adapter->rx_ps_pages &&
> + (features & NETIF_F_RXCSUM) && (features & NETIF_F_RXHASH)) {
> + e_err("Enabling both receive checksum offload and receive hashing is not possible with jumbo frames. Disable jumbos or enable only one of the receive offload features.\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
This is a very long output string.
I think keeping individual dmesg lines shorter is preferred.
It might be better to use 2 e_err lines like:
e_err("Enabling both receive checksum offload and receive hashing is not possible with jumbo frames\n");
e_err("Disable jumbos or enable only one of the receive offload features\n");
or
e_err("Enabling both receive checksum offload and receive hashing is not possible with jumbo frames\n"
"Disable jumbos or enable only one of the receive offload features\n");
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-04 0:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-03 19:19 [net-next 00/11][pull request] Intel Wired LAN Driver Updates Jeff Kirsher
2012-01-03 19:19 ` [net-next 01/11] e1000: fix lockdep splat in shutdown handler Jeff Kirsher
2012-01-03 19:19 ` [net-next 02/11] igb: Add support for byte queue limits Jeff Kirsher
2012-01-03 19:19 ` [net-next 03/11] igb: add basic runtime PM support Jeff Kirsher
2012-01-03 19:19 ` [net-next 04/11] igb: reset PHY after recovering from PHY power down Jeff Kirsher
2012-01-03 19:19 ` [net-next 05/11] netdev: FCoE: Add new ndo_get_fcoe_hbainfo() call Jeff Kirsher
2012-01-03 20:07 ` David Miller
2012-01-03 20:53 ` Parikh, Neerav
2012-01-03 19:19 ` [net-next 06/11] ixgbe: FCoE: Add support for " Jeff Kirsher
2012-01-03 19:19 ` [net-next 07/11] e1000e: cleanup Rx checksum offload code Jeff Kirsher
2012-01-03 20:08 ` David Miller
2012-01-03 20:17 ` Allan, Bruce W
2012-01-03 21:00 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-01-03 21:15 ` David Miller
2012-01-03 21:24 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-01-03 22:02 ` David Miller
2012-01-03 19:19 ` [net-next 08/11] e1000e: add Receive Packet Steering (RPS) support Jeff Kirsher
2012-01-03 20:09 ` David Miller
2012-01-03 20:16 ` Allan, Bruce W
2012-01-03 20:27 ` David Miller
2012-01-03 20:28 ` Allan, Bruce W
2012-01-04 0:12 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2012-01-04 2:06 ` Harvey Harrison
2012-01-03 21:05 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-01-06 17:22 ` Allan, Bruce W
2012-01-06 17:31 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-01-03 19:19 ` [net-next 09/11] e1000e: re-enable alternate MAC address for all devices which support it Jeff Kirsher
2012-01-03 19:19 ` [net-next 10/11] e1000e: convert head, tail and itr_register offsets to __iomem pointers Jeff Kirsher
2012-01-03 19:19 ` [net-next 11/11] e1000e: pass pointer to ring struct instead of adapter struct Jeff Kirsher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1325635974.24257.20.camel@joe2Laptop \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=bruce.w.allan@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gospo@redhat.com \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sassmann@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).